company told me to leave on nov,they said they will do settlement later
in feb they vacated premises and company sttaus shown as written off
they paid only 1 month salary
any help?
my father expired in 2002 when I was 19 old
mother been extreme cruel but very difficult to prove
1) she snapped my grandpa neck in 2008 ,my father already expired,I was out of station ,and my aunt is silly to understand this things,till I come back funeral was done,now after all this years while altercation on call she indirectly admitted it
my main question is she is 62 now ,will she get hnaged or pardon for age?
2) she did not supported me for education but always taken money from me,bad mouthed abt my father and grandpa
relatives had asked money from me and she always told them not to return money to me just to harrsme
there are many things ,can anybody give me such instances where I can prove her
Sir, if some one has forged signature of ours on blank cheque of ours and tried to present in bank with malicious intent of cornering us, what should we do ? could you pls tell how to approach this scenario ? pls tell complete procedure sir.
Can we approach police station ? if so wats the procedure ( because bank people may not be giving that cheque copy to us)
My vehicle is NOT seized by police. But there are oral statements of eye witnesses in ipc 338 accident case.
What are the chance of conviction in my case. will i get imprisonment
Police seized Driving License, insurance certificates and Aadhar card when they arrested me.
We have a township of 4 towers and a common podium area with parking beneath it. Can we go ahead with a deemed conveyance separately for 4 towers including podium. The builder had constructed 2 separate townships side by side (adjacent) to each other with separate names for both the townships. However it is unknown if he got them approved as 2 separate projects or got them approved as one single project from the municipal authorise. Our township has boundary walls what cover our area end to end on all sides. Request your informed opinion.
I recently visited passport office for my kid's passport application. My kid's name is Rahul Y Singh. However, Passport officer stated that we can't have middle name as initials in passport. Is that really a rule and is there a possible work around? Also if I do extend the middle name as Yog in passport can I still get other legal documents such as Aadhar, school certificate etc with middle name as initials?
In the village of Mylapore in Tamil Nadu there is an eminent businessman
turned politician Rahul Raghuvanshi. He has been elected to Tamil Nadu
assembly successfully 3 consecutive times. Rahul a management graduate
from Annamalai University was an active student in Youth Politics. He was The
President of Janata Morcha Youth wing and thereafter he joined Janata
Morcha, he held several posts within the party and at a young age of 31
became MLA. Rahul is a 2nd generation politician and son of renowned
industrialist Bhargav Raghuvanshi, Shri Raghav Raghuvanshi has been a 2
times MLA and 3 times MP from Mylapore constituency, he also held the
portfolio of Minister for Urban Development when Janata Morcha was in power
in 1987.Rahul Raghuvanshi being an Industrialist owned several factories
which had huge manpower and Trade unions with political affiliation. Rahul
after procuring a degree in management from Annamalai University chose to
pursue his family business, in the course of his business he had to grapple
with many problems relating to workforce such as absenteeism, low
productivity, and acrimonious disputes as the trade unions had differences
within themselves. A strike broke out in Mr. Raghuvanshi’s factory on account
of denial of bonus and incentives. There was labour unrest, sloganeering and
chaos. The Trade Union Leader Babu Shankar was affiliated to Samaj
Saghatan the party which was in the opposition and arch rival of Janata
Morcha the Party in power.
Rahul Raghuvanshi was in a fix and catch 22 situation as the labourers
besieged the bunglow of Rahul Raghuvanshi at the behest of Babu Shankar on
account of political rivalry there was wide media coverage of the issue. On the
2nd February, 2012 situation was extremely turbulent hence the local police
imposed Section 144 of Cr.PC and also detained a few labourers U/S 151 of
Cr.PC. The detention of many labourers exceeded the prescribed time ordained
by Cr.PC. As Rahul Raghuvanshi used his clout and influence to suppress the
agitation, the family member of a worker filed a Habeas Corpus petition on 6th
February, 2012 Under Article 226 and 227 of Chennai High Court challenging
the detention of several workers and also claimed compensation. The Chennai
2
Bench consisting of Chief justice allowed the petition and gave relief to the
prayers of the petitioners and also awarded compensation. The Trade Union
leader Babu Shankar urged the leader of opposition in Tamil Nadu assembly to
broach a debate on Rahul Raghuvanshi’s undue influence and causing loss to
poor labourers. This led to furor in the Assembly demanding resignation of
Rahul Raghuvanshi was the post of standing committee for Education and
Environment. Rahul Raghuvanshi did not relent. This lead to social unrest and
there were protest marches across the city, agitation which led to Gheraos and
Bandhs. The Home minister tried to control the situation with Rapid Action
Force and Local constabulary. In the course of this chaos Rahul Raghuvanshi
made a public speech at Tradulai Swamy stadium on 14th May 2012 in the
course of his speech he called the agitators of Samaj Sanghtans as ‘wild
creatures’ and urged the Janata Morcha workers to give a ‘fitting reply’ to the
protesters. This caused a furor and there was law and order problem which
resulted in casualties and damage to property. Rahul Raghuvanshi was held
responsible for whatever transpired and he was compelled to resign from the
committees he was part of and the portfolio he held. There was round the clock
coverage of the incidents of violence by the media. The opposition demanded an
inquiry of the incidents and insisted on setting up a commission. A
Commission was constituted in August, 2012 by the Ruling Party i.e Janata
Morcha under the auspices of retired judge, Justice Vishwanath to enquire and
investigate into this matter. The commission submitted its report before the
House on 17th August, 2013 of the incidents of February, 2012.There was
elections hence the commission report was debated fiercely then kept in
abeyance. Samaj Sanghatan captured Power and Muthuswamy Nair became
the Chief Minister in 21 December 2013 and the commission report was again
debated with disruptions in the House. The speech delivered by Rahul
Raghuvanshi was regarded as a hate speech causing enmity between two
communities hence he was booked under sec 153 A of IPC for which
Punishment in 3 years, after a lot of pandemonium the Commission report was
implemented on 31st December, 2013. The home minister demanded arrest of
Rahul Raghuvanshi and Rahul Raghuvanshi was arrested and produced before
magistrate on 11th January 2014. The magistrate took cognizance of the
3
complaint and convicted Rahul Raghu Vanshi for 3 years imprisonment. The
order was challenged in court of sessions/district court, in May, 2015 the order
was upheld and eventually it was challenged in Chennai High Court. The High
Court admitted the appeal and overruled conviction on 16th November, 2015 of
Rahul Raghuvanshi and found that lower courts made gross error in passing
such orders. State challenged the High Court order of acquittal in the Supreme
Court of India.
Issues
1) Is he said appeal maintainable in the Supreme Court?
2) Is the High court justified in setting aside the session court’s order?
3) Does the case have anything pertaining to limitation act or has time barred
as per the relevant legal provisions?
4) Is sanction required for prosecution of Rahul Raghuvanshi as he is member
of state assembly?
5) Is the government bound by the findings of Justice Viswanathan commission
as regards its implementation or not?
I plan to buy 2 adjacent plots (each with 40*30 dimension) which come under panchayat. The plots have e-swathu but there are some discrepancies with respect to the checkbandi i.e the information about the other plots/roads in the North, South, West, East directions have been swapped. Also for one of the plot, the North-South is given as 30 and East-West is given as 40 though it should be North-South as 40 and East-West as 30. It seems most of the plots in the place are that way and a local lawyer said this is a minor issue. According to him as long as the land extent of 1200 Sq. Feet is shown in e-swathu it should be fine.He said that the people in the panchayat office are not really good with maths and numbers and it is common to see these errors. I got to know from an acquaintance that the seller of the plots is not keen to take up the process to update e-swathu since there is a demand for plots in this area and he will anyways find a buyer. Hence I am thinking of buying the plot and then try for rectification of the errors in the e-swathu? In this case, can the sale deed have the correct dimensions and checkbandi info or should it compulsorily replicate the data as provided in e-swathu which is actually incorrect. My query is whether the e-swathu of these plots can be corrected in order to have the correct measure for North-South and East-West and also to update the checkbandi information? And should this compulsorily be done prior to the sale deed registration? Can this be done by the PDO at the panchayat office itself? And what is the process/ duration it could take if I take up this myself?
As a landlord ,How many days vecate notice should i give for a tenent ,who is running a commercial business.
Regarding shortfall after auctioned gold
My father had taken gold loan 2 years back. Due to financial crisis he could not repay it and gold was auctioned in Nov 22.There is shortfall of 46k after selling the gold and I received a notice(in father's name)on 20th Jan 2023, to repay the shortfall.
Last year in october my father died. Am i liable to pay the shortfall? I myself am going through tough financial time.