LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

perumal   18 September 2018 at 15:29

Hindu succession act 1956 and amended act 2005

Sir,
A property of two houses jointly constructed stands in my mother’s name. She died during the year 1996, well before the enactment of amendcd Act, 2005. The legal heirs are as follows.
1. My father – Widower - died during 2012, ie after the enactment of amendcd Act, 2005
2. Myself - only Son
3.Ist daughter – married before the death of my mother i.e., during the year 1979
4. IInd daughter – married before the death of my mother i.e., during the year 1983

My father while he was alive, released his 1/4th UDS share of one house (among two) by registerd deed to one of my sister and also made a open in the centre wall between two houses and kept open to the other house which is under my occupation and enjoyment. Through the new opening door, my sister who enjoyed the other house and IInd sister (she was allotted a house by my father in her name by regd.deed) blocked my kitchen, bath room, latrine and stair to upstair threatening that equal share should be abortioned and partitioned.
I have not yet approached any court to seek remedy.
Now, shall this issue will attract sec 23 of hindu succession Act 1956.
Please kindly inform the legality over this issue to proceed further.
Perumal.M

Krishnakanth   18 September 2018 at 14:23

Muslim property selling

Can a Muslim sell his self earned property(building) to other person when his family members objecting him to sell.and after selling the property can the family members go to court for the property?

lucky12321   18 September 2018 at 13:00

Be-peshi complaint

Hello Experts,

I would like to know What is "Be-Peshi" complaint against wife?


Regards,
Lucky

Amit Oza   18 September 2018 at 12:43

Detials of case

I want some detials of one case pertaning to udaipur family court .

Mahesh   18 September 2018 at 11:38

Red stamp in case of regularised property

I purchased a property in Rohini Delhi upper ground floor three months back. I checked all the papers, it was okay.

But when i saw the registry, red stamp was there. I was shocked.

Again i checked all the documents, Regularisation charges were paid by the seller in 2013 under self assessment scheme.

I approached MCD, they are asking bribe. What is the appropriate solution.

lucky12321   18 September 2018 at 10:52

Be-peshi complaint

Hello Experts,

I would like to know what is Be-Peshi complaint against wife .

Regards,
Lucky

NAGARAJ   18 September 2018 at 09:50

Cooperative banks under rti

Can i seek loan account information under rti act in karnataka..any citations kindly update.tq for info sir

Wasim   18 September 2018 at 03:13

Need new electricity connection

A landlord had given rights to develop his property to the developer..Developer developed the property n sold to 3rd party..Now 3rd party needs electricity..a new connection which got denied by the energy suppliers...coz the landlord has sent a legal notice to the energy suppliers to not give the connection...3rd party doesn't knws what's wrong(dispute) between the landlord and the developer but 3rd party has the true copy of the agreement (which between landlord & developer) which says that the landlord has no issues regarding water supply,ration card,electricity taken on the property by developer and 3rd party also have the sale agreement of the property (which between developer & 3rd party) which says same that the developer has no issues regarding water supply,ration card,electricity taken on the property by 3rd party..Tata power has already given cable connection but is not giving the meter...despite showing the true copy to the energy suppliers What should 3rd party do to get a new connection on his purchased land..?

Anonymous   17 September 2018 at 23:22

Intentionally non performing employees

Dear Sir,
Nice to read about the Knowledge you have shared.
Why not any one of you is finding out and writing up an article on:
"Intentionally Non-Performing Employees Case"
Now, Don't tell that you have never heard of such employees.
The question is when these kind of employees threat to be going to the labour commission or consumer court, what are the rights of a company?
If the Company is not paying such employees, then why does that becomes an offense. Such Employees keep switching the companies in 1-6 months duration. They keep enjoying the the tag of being employed until they are caught not-working.
When caught, they say they were not sure whether the company will operate or not and whether their clients will get the services properly or not. So, they did not get the clients.

What do you legally suggest in such cases, a company must do?
Especially, such cases arises with the sales people.
These days, employees try to be more bigger and smarter than the company, where as it is very simple "Employees bring revenue for the company and from that revenue the salaries and other benefits, perks and expenses are taken care of"
Or is it written some where that employees can decide to be non-performing and piss down the company for the payments.
I hope you know, that it takes some time to understand whether the zero or lowered down performance is intentional non-performance or it is just not happening. In such cases, company seeks time either by delaying the salaries of such doubtful employees or some other practices.
But later on the same non-performing employees, start creating the ruckus by spreading negativity amongst other employees, clients and also start threatening the company with the help of "lawyers"

What remedies and solutions do you suggest in legal terms against such employees.
Because it is very simple, if a growing company gets 10 sales employees every month who are intentionally not performing. So, keep paying their salaries leads to losses to the company as well the company fails to reward the actually performing employees.

Waiting for your Reply

arunkumar   17 September 2018 at 14:02

Action under mcs act 1960 section 80

Society committee tenure of 10 yrs completed and society charge was given to Administrator appointed by Registrar pune.After gap of 3 months new committee is formed of no of defaulter members and they took the charge from Administrator in the month of june.Now the secretary of outgoing committee received letter from registrar that some documents are missing from the record of the society on the complaint filed by new committee.The allegations made are totally false and baseless. They are asking for original documents of 2 flat holders which were never given to the society.The original documents are always with the owner. and the copy of that document is with the society record.This is only to harass the secretary of previous committee . My request to the experts that how to convince the Registrar for that and what further action registrar can take only on the basis of written complaint without any evidence.What reply or action is expected from Outgoing secretary to finish off the matter.