Anonymous
26 May 2021 at 19:36
If someone is fined of rupees 160 by police for non wearing mask and a gd is registered by his name and he is released in 1-2hours will this effect his government job? Will this record be kept by the police?
And what will he/she can tick in his govt job attestation form where they are asking for
a) Have you ever been arrested ? Yes/No
(b) Have you ever been prosecuted? Yes/No
(c) Have you ever been kept under detention? Yes/No
(d) Have you ever been bound down? Yes/No
(e) Have you ever been fined by a Court of Law? Yes/No
(f) Have you ever been convicted by a Court of law
for any offence ? Yes/No
Please answer
Shakshi
26 May 2021 at 19:15
What is the stamp duty payable on Share subscription agreement in Karnataka? Please mention the legal provisions.
Sourav Ghosh
26 May 2021 at 18:27
If someone is fined by police in the police station and filled 2/3 forms and a general diary is registered in his is it considered as his arrest?will this record stay in the police records or affects his or her govt job police verification?
Sourav Ghosh
26 May 2021 at 18:24
If someone is fined for non wearing of mask by police of rupees 160/170 then what will write in the attestation form of any govt job?
What will he say yes/no in this Section
Have you ever been arrested by court of law?
Yes/No
jaimin patel
26 May 2021 at 13:02
I HAVE PURCHASED A PROPERTY 5 YEARS AGO WITH A RENTED SHOP BY OLD OWNER 40 YEARS AGO. NOW I HAVE TO VACCANT THE SHOP BUT THE RENTER IS NOT AGREE NOR TO AGREE YO GIVE ME RENT AS PER RULES WHAT SHOUD I DO
ketan shah
26 May 2021 at 12:01
Respected Sirs,
U am the Landlord of a building in Ghatkopar East Mumbai. I have a property which is given on Rent to a Tenant. (It is NOT on leave and License and Not Lease. ) The Tenant is paying Rs.1264 per month for a 400 sq ft flat which includes Rent Property tax water and electric charges
The Tenant is 86 years old and his wife is 82 and at present she is in a very bad state of health. The Tenant also is suffering from Heart ailment, and has very bad asthama. The doctors are not hopeful of their survival specially the wife . And they have NO children.
In this case what is the legal right of the relatives of the couple who are not staying with them. There is only one sister and her husband in the family and they are staying in Vapi having a Mango farm with a big farm house and they also do not have any children.Can they claim the tenancy right or the flat possession comes to the Landlord. As the Tenancy is prior to the Rent control Act 1999 there is No Tenancy Rent agreement.
Your valuable advice would be helpful .Thanking you in advance.
Anonymous
26 May 2021 at 09:39
Hello,
My wife as a part of rituals have moved into her mother's house after the delivery and was supposed to return on the 90th day. My mother in law is not interested in sending her back and is creating issues. My wife is in support of her mother and have started talking very rudely to me and my family members. She is accusing me of a lot of things including harassment since 2.5 years, ever since we got married. I know it's just because of her mother she is saying all this and yes even my wife's childhood was difficult as her mother and father were living a seperated life. Her father doesn't have any stand or say in her house and all the decisions are taken by her mother. Her father is supporting us and has said that he has also been a victim of her mother's mental torture
shyam lal
26 May 2021 at 08:39
I am the sole beneficiary of my deceased father.WILL(self acquired property)
As it is well settled legal position that a mere mutation in the revenue or municipal records does not create title to property nor does it divest any one of title to property.
Query , to which department should I apply on the basis of the WILL to confer the title /owner ship in my individual name.
Anonymous
26 May 2021 at 00:22
Accused convicted in trial court. aquitted by sessions court in appeal. Whether second appeal lies to high court or revision. Clarify with judgements if any
We have filed appeal before Madras High Court, but it is returened mentioning justice Anand Venkatesh Judgement
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on : 04.03.2020
Dated : 28.05.2020
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN and
The Honourable Mr. Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH
Criminal Appeal Nos.89 & 90 of 2020 and Criminal Revision Case Nos.494
& 536 of 2019 & Crl.M.P.No.1789, 1794 & 7289 of 2019
stating that appeal does not lie only revision .Hence this query i am asking for any supreme court judgements
I have got madhya pradesh and kerala high court judgements that only appeal should be filed against aquittal
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Parasram Yadav vs Pravin Soni on 6 September, 2019
Author: Sunil Kumar Awasthi
1
High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Bench at Indore
Criminal Revision No.303/2016
Indore, Dated 06.09.2019
Mr. Vishal Lashkari, learned counsel for the
applicant / complainant.
The applicant has preferred this criminal revision
under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (herein after referred to as
the Code) against order dated 08.12.2015 passed by
learned 12th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore (MP) in
Criminal Appeal No.589/2015 and Criminal Appeal
No.615/2015, whereby judgment dated 28.07.2015
passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore,
District Indore (MP) in Criminal Case No.7893/2010
has been set aside; and the respondent / accused was
convicted for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
According to the provisions of Section 378 (1) (b) of the Code, the State Government may, in any
case, direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the High Court from an original or
appellate order of acquittal passed by any Court other than a High Court, or an order of acquittal
passed by the Court of Session in revision. Section 378 (4) of the Code provides that if such an order
of acquittal is passed in any case, instituted upon complaint and the High Court, on an application
made to it by the complainant in this behalf, grants special leave to appeal from the order of
acquittal, the complainant may present such an appeal to the High Court.
In the present matter, the applicant / complainant has not filed any application under Section 378
(4) of the Code for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Sessions
Court in appeal. Therefore, the present revision application is not maintainable.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks time to argue on the point of
maintainability of the present revision.
Matter be listed after two weeks.
(S.K. Awasthi) Judge rcp
Kerala High Court
Revision vs By Adv. Dr.George Abraham
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2785 of 2011 ( )
---------------------------------
JUDGMENT IN Crl.A 131/2010 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-III),
NORTH PARAVUR
JUDGMENT IN CC 872/2006 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE
COURT- III, ALUVA
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
---------------------------------------
PAULSON P.VARKEY, S/O.VARKEY
PAINADATH HOUSE, NAYATHODU KARA, ANGAMALY
NAYATHODU PO, PIN 683 572.
BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT/:
------------------------
1. JAISON VARGHESE , S/O.C.J.VARGHESE
CHIRAMEL HOUSE, HOUSE NO.MVTRR 4/30/43/2389
MOOKOOTTIL TEMPLE ROAD, PETTA JUNCTION
POONITHURA P.O.
2. M/S. WEST COAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS
REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER JAISON VARGHESE
CHIRAMEL HOUSE, HOUSE NO.MVTRR 4/30/43/2389
MOOKOOTTIL TEMPLE ROAD, PETTA JUNCTION
POONITHURA P.O., PIN-682 317.
3. STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ERNAKULAM.
R1,R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.ALI
R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
Revision vs By Adv. Dr.George Abraham
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/41008301/ 1
ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
SCL.
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
-------------------------------------
Crl.R.P. No.2785 of 2011
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2015
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the complainant in C.C.No.872 of 2006 on the files of the Court of the
Judicial Magistrate of First Class-III, Aluva.
2. The accused was convicted by the trial court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months and a fine of 5,00,000/-. Against the said
conviction and sentence, the accused filed appeal. As per judgment dated 4.8.2011 in Crl.A.No.131 of
2010, the appellate court acquitted the accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act. Aggrieved by the said acquittal of the accused, the complainant before the trial
court has come up with this revision petition.
3. Heard.
4. In view of the provisions of Sub Section 4 of Section 378 of the Code, the remedy of the
complainant in a complaint Crl.R.P. No.2785 of 2011 under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act to challenge the order of acquittal passed by the trial court or the appellate court, is
to file appeal before the High Court after obtaining special leave. A Division Bench of this Court in
Omana Jose v. State of Kerala [2014 (2) KLT 504] held that the complainant in a case under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot challenge the order of acquittal before the Sessions
Court under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and his remedy is only to
file an appeal to the High Court with special leave under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure. In view of the above reason, this revision petition is not maintainable.
In the result, this revision petition stands dismissed as not maintainable. Needless to say that this
order will not take away the rights, if any, of the revision petitioner in seeking other remedies
available to him under law.
Sd/-
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE Scl/04.11.2015
Revision vs By Adv. Dr.George Abraham
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/41008301/
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
State electricity board
Respected Experts,
to which higher authority can I as an individual citizen complain about the state electricity board for charging unnecessary charges on my electricity bill.