DETAILS OF CASE BEFORE JMFC
JAIME
(Querist) 28 April 2011
This query is : Open
SIR,
IN ORDER TO OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION SANAD FOR AN AREA OF 425 SQUARE METERS A PERSON WENT TO THE EXTENT OF IMPERSONATING THE PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARED IN FORM I&XIV OF THE PROPERTY. IT WAS REPORTED TO THE DY COLLECTOR AND THE POLICE STATION OF THE OFFENCE AND A COMPLAINT WAS FILED BY DEPUTY COLLECTOR BEFORE THE JMFC. AFTER GATHERING THE EVIDENCE OF HANDWRITING ANALYSIS CHARGE SHEET IS FILED BEFORE THE JMFC. LATELY DURING INQUIRY IT WAS INFORMED THAT THIS CASE WAS FOR ARGUMENT BEFORE TRIAL. THE IMPERSONATER CLAIMES THAT HE WAS FALSLEY ACCUSED BY THE COMPLAINANTS. THE IMPERSONATER CLAIMS HE HAS BY MISTAKE AND WITHOUT KNOWING SIGNED THE NAME OF THE PERSON APPEARING IN FORM I&XIV AS IT IS AN ALIAS NAME OF HIS LATE FATHER. THE FATHER'S NAME IN BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE IMPERSONATOR DIFFERS FORM THE NAME APPEARING IN THE SAID FORM. MOREOVER THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROCEQUTOR IS THE WIFE OF THE LAWYER REPRESENTING THE IMPERSONATOR IN A CIVIL CASE IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAME PROPERTY THAT WAS LATLY ENCROACHED AND FRAUDULENTLY PARTITIONED PREVIOUSLY. THOUGH THE IMPERSONATOR HAS ANOTHER LAWYER REPRESENTING THE CRIMINAL CASE, THERE IS EVERY LIKELYHOOD OF A COMPROMISE AND FAILURE ON PART OF THE APP TO PENALISE THIS CULPRIT. I AM THE COMPLAINANT IS THERE ANY THING I CAN DO TO PREVENT THE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.
