Shailesh Kumar Shah's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 7422

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Member (Account Deleted) says : civil
in karnataka state, a sale deed was registered in 1974, regarding an open site and a home. but in panchayath property register book, the purchaser's name was entered only for HOME and not for OPEN SITE, for open site someone's name was entered as it is his inherited property and since 1974 till today he paid the tax of that land, the tax payer and purchaser both have the possession over the disputed open site. now in panchayath, there is no documents available prior to 1974. QUESTION IS WHETHER THE SALE DEED IS VALID OR THE TAX PAYER IS THE OWNER OF THAT OPEN SITE AS HE PAID THE TAX AND HAVE POSSESSION? IS THERE ANY CITATIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER?

Sagar says : Please help sir
Dear Sir/Mam, I am raising this issue here that has victimsed me for many years and I want some support, suggestions and guidance through experts through the medium of this web-site. I have scored 48% in graduation(B.Sc.) and nowadays whenever there is a notitication of any competitive exam, they ask for minimim graduation percentage besides score in their exam. I recently appeared for Institute of Banking Personnel Selection(IBPS) Bank Probationary Officer(PO) exam. The notification of IBPS Written test for Bank PO was like this : A degree in any discipline from a recognized University or any equivalent qualification recognized as such by the Central Government. They also mentioned that "Each participating Public Sector Bank will independently issue a separate recruitment notification, specifying their vacancies and stipulating the eligibility criteria in terms of age, educational qualification, experience (if any), minimum required level of IBPS score in each component test plus Total Weighted Score (if any) etc. " I was not applying for any Bank PO so far because till now each bank was separately taking its recruitment exam and was asking for minimum graduation percentage to appear for their exam, but when from 2011, IBPS started taking exam for 19 PSU banks, I appeared for written exam as there was no percentage requirement there in its notification, and now after clearing written exam, each bank is asking for minimum percentage of graduation to appear for interview. I want legal opinion on this regarding ways to challenge this in a court of law. Actually, its not just IBPS against which I want to challenge, I want to challenge requirement of this percentage in graduation criterion itself by any copetitive exam that ask graduation from any discipling and not any specific discipline. When in the year 2006, Common Admission Test (CAT), first time brought in minimum 50% in graduation criterion, the reason cited was to reduce number of applicants for that exam. Is this reason fair? This criterion has nothing to do with selection of good quality students, but to make their work easier they bring in such criterion. Can they gurantee that any student who has not scored minimum 50% in graduation would surely be not able to clear their written exam? And, if some student is having capability and desire to crach this exam then isn't this injustice to him? I am ready to spend money to challenge this absurd criterion of minimum graduation percentage, just require some intial guidance as how it can be challenged. I will be highly obliged to anyone, who can help me with his/her knowledge to challenge this matter in court of law.

Member (Account Deleted) says : I NEED UR HELP
HELLO Sir, I need ur precious advise regarding: a sale deed was registered in 1974, regarding an open site and a home. but in panchayath property register book, the purchaser's name was entered only for HOME and not for OPEN SITE, for open site someone's name was entered as it is his inherited property and till today he paid the tax of that land, the tax payer and purchaser both have the possession over the disputed open site. now in panchayath, there is no documents available prior to 1974. QUESTION IS WHETHER THE SALE DEED IS VALID OR THE TAX PAYER IS THE OWNER OF THAT OPEN SITE AS HE PAID THE TAX AND HAVE POSSESSION? IS THERE ANY CITATIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER?

Pushpendra Singh says : Regarding central govt service
Mera selection Railway main ho gaya hai. 2004 main mera jhagra ho gaya tha lakin beh kais khtam ho gaya hai us kais main mujhe koi saja nahi hui thi. to kya mere police varification koi problem ageyi jissi mera selection ruk sakta hai.

rasssssssssssssssssss says : illegal--agreement
Sir,In yr 2008 I purchased land area 2000sqmt, but then lately I came to know that out of 2000sqmt, 550 sqmt of land is the porperty which doesn't belong to the seller i.e he has illegally sold property of an area 550 sqmt. we have informed the seller and he agreed to pay the amount but through installment for 2 years. can you pls guide me . I would like to know if legally, agreement is valid in this case and what are the payment terms i shd put in the agreement. pls reply its urgent

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799