LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More



prabhakar singh's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 21832

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    i can answer questions relating to civil laws,land laws in up,a few relating to criminal law,but would not be able to answer questions relating company law matters.

    My area of expertise
    my area of expertise is in hindu law contract act,partnership act,negotiable instrument act and rent control and transfer of proprty act .

    My experience in the area (years):
    i am practicing lawyer in civil court since1975

    Organizations I belong to:
    self employed independent practice

    Publications or writing which has appeared :
    none

    Educational credentials:
    bcom.llb

    Award & Honors:
    none

  • sita ram s says : PLEASE HELP ME IN 138 NI JUDGEMENT
    Hi Sirs and Friends, Hoping that you all are fine and doing well. Myself is the complainant and sole proprietor of one firm. I filed 138 NI in lower court and judgment came against me, even complaint is genuine and all the payments made to accused through bank transactions. In last, reply arguments one memo submitted by my advocate which was mentioning all the exhibits in tabular form for better understanding to the judge as accused submitted so many evidences during DW1 stage. Here is the summary of the judgment. Point for consideration is whether the complainant proved the guilt of the accused beyond all the reasonable doubt for an offence punishable U/s 138 of N.I. Act? The answer to the point is NEGATIVE. The complaint shall fail on three grounds. They are: GROUND NO. 1: 1. Complainant is not payee or holder in due course of the subject cheque Ex. P2 and therefore complainant is not competent to file the complaint. -Referred Sec. 142 (a) of N.I. Act Cognizance of offences: -Notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974). -In the case of ‘Milind Shripad Chandurkar Vs. Kalim M. Khan and another reported in AIR 2011 Supreme Court 1588, at Para Nos. 21, 22, 23 & 24 of the said judgement. My Exhibits proved: a. The amount transferred from my account, for which statements marked under exhibits. b. In accused’s promissory note my name, my firm name mentioned. c. In one of the exhibit my name as proprietor along with firm name mentioned. My Questions: 1. What steps to be taken further? either should I go for appeal, If so, can I submit more documents in sessions court or can we demand to send summons to bankers for verification the proprietor’s ship matter? 2. Can I reopen the case in session ACMM Court? 3. What are supreme court citations, judgements to support my case? GROUND NO. 2: 2. The amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- was given by the complainant to the accused as his share of investment in the business X Y Z Pvt. Ltd. but not as hand loan. Referred: NIL no reference, citations, judgments or act, etc. My Exhibits proved: a. The MOU between accused and complaint showed that there is no ‘investment’ word used. But in legal lawyer notice, court complaint this ‘investment’ word mentioned come places. b. Accused took money from complainant for processing the loan of X Y Z Pvt. Ltd. but accused didn’t process the loan at all. In this regard Complainant took letter from X YX Z Pvt. Ltd. stating that loan not processed. c. Accused used this money for his personal loan purpose not for X Y Z Pvt. Ltd. My Questions: 1. What steps to be taken further? Either should I go for appeal, If so, can I submit more documents in sessions court? Or can I reopen the case in session ACMM Court? 2. What are supreme court citations, judgements to support my case? GROUND NO. 3: 3. Return of the subject cheque Ex. P2 by the bank as unpaid is not proved legally. - Referred 146 of N. I. Act - That certificate of Ex. P2 is contrary to Sec. 2 (8) (c) and Sec. 2 A of the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, 1891 My Exhibits proved: a. Accused cheque was CTS and multicity cheque. On the cheque the following mentioned: “Payable at par all branches of State Bank” “Multicity cheque is payable up to a maximum of Rs. 10,00,000/-“ When I deposited the cheque, I got cheque return memo (computer generated memo) stating “Exceeds Arrangement”. b. I submitted the same memo in the lower court as received by me from the bank. But Judge of lower court didn’t qualify the ‘cheque return memo’, because it was computer generated and not having the bank seal and sign. c. Judge also raised objection about the monitory value of cheque limiting to Rs. 10,00,000/- but the cheque amount was Rs. 23,50,000/- My Questions: 1. What steps to be taken further? Either should I go for appeal, If so, can I submit more documents in sessions court? Or can I reopen the case in session ACMM Court? 2. What are supreme court citations, judgements to support my case? 3. What is the meaning of “ Exceeds Arrangement” in this particular case? FINALLY I REQUEST YOU ALL TO HELP ME OUT OF THIS SITUATION. AFTER THIS JUDGEMENT I THOUGHT OF COMMITTING SUICIDE. EAGRLY AWIAITING FOR HELPING SUPPORT. PLEASE SAVE ME FROM THE ABOVE ISSUE. THANKS.

  • santosh says : Transfer of Property
    Dear Sir,mere pitaji Jan 2014 ko Gujar gaye,aur hum jis ghar me rehate hai wo abhitak unakehi naam par hai, 1990 sal me Maharashtra Government ke 10% cultural quta se hume ye flat mila hai,ab ma ke naam per karanekeliye kya karana padega. please Help.

  • shrikant says : Injunction order
    Respected members The suit for declaration and injunction is pending between two parties say A&B.The Ho'ble court passed ad interim Injunction order agaist B restraining her allainating or creating third party intrest in suit by way of transfer,morgadge or gifting etc till the disposal of suit.Now B has made electricity connection application to Electricity distribution co.ltd.my question is 1)Electricity distribution co.ltd is not party to the suit whether the injunction order is applicable? 2)there is no comment about electricity connection in injunction order 3)whether the objection of objector regarding not releasing electricity connection is sustainable in eyes of law?

  • Kaushik Nandy says : Repairing permission of rented room.
    Sir,One of my tenant who is in procession of one no. room at 2nd floor of my residential house and paying monthly rent of Rs. 26/- (twenty six) per month in kolkata municipal area, The room is in dilapidated condition and need to be repaired which will cost approx. 40,000/- so I proposed to enhance the rate @ 40,000/-/36 months ( repairing cost would be recovered in three years) but , tenant neither willing to pay enhance rent, not willing to vacate the room , at any moment there could be an accident due to bad condition of dwelling unit, and tenant verbally asking to give him repairing permission, PL advice course of action.

  • aditya says : transfer of property issue
    Sir I am from chhattisgarh. There are 30 acres of ancestral land in my and my brother's name(jointly he is partner in every acre of land).he took loan of 3 lakhs from government bank under some kind of farming scheme,putting the land as security(since that land placed as security is also in my name so signature was also needed but he fraudly released the loan without my sign),now he was unable to pay the loan so, he asked me if l pay the loan then he would give me 3acres of his share.I paid the loan he said that he would give me this and this... land(without any legal formalities just orally) meanwhile he died without registering that 3acres into my name. Now his widow is ready to give me 3acres as promised by her husband. So here my question start: 1.can I separate ""only"" that 3acres which are going to be in my name as our 30 acres are jointly in my and my deceased brother's name.since I don't want to have a partion. please tell me. A way...and sir i would be glad if you tell me the documents and procedure involved

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799