adv. rajeev ( rajoo )'s Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 7714

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

sanjay agarwal says : ancestralproperty
dear sir my name is anurag i live in kanpur uttar pradesh my grandfather owned a plot of 5000sqm in 1930 when he died he had 4 sons they all distributed 1200sqm among them among his 4 sons one is my father he also got 1200sqm after my father and mother death i was left was 2 brothers nd one sister and my sister got ,married in 1993 my grandfather and father did not have any will in 2008 me and my brother distrbuted 625sqm each but in 2012 my sister suit a owner of declaration in court and she claimed for her share soooo sir please tell me will she get her part in the property that she is claiming for in legal way???????? please reply me soon sir.......

rajesh says : limitation & adverse
author : rajesh Posted about 22 hours ago in suit for bare injuction the trial court errored by decreeing then we approached senior as RA there appelete court reversed trial court ordered in our favour. It was ordered in our favour in high court, karnataka & supreme court of india in our favour. Now they have approaced first time suit for posession as thier name are in extract copy but dont have blue print who constructed the shop. Brief fact of case- The suit is multi storied our posession is in ground floor from 1971. suit is of ground floor and opposites are in first floor. now the query is of adverse or limitation. We have not put counter claim. We only want case to be dismissed. so request is for citations and any good sugesstion or documents. Pls. help

Lt COL R S shekhawat says : benefts for prior military service in civil job -u
I will start by humble submission with CHANAKAYA”S quote : The Day when soldiers are forced to fight for salaries would be a very sad day for a Nation”. please read the GOI letter my requisition is based on the ambit & scope of this MOD letter only 560/43/TA-(a)/03/00/S(GS-1) Government of India, Ministry of Defense, New Delhi, the 7th Jan 1994 To The Chief Secretary to All State Governments/Union Territories . Subject: Concession & Incentives sanctioned by State Governments to Territorial Army personnel. Sir, This refers to Ministry of Defense letter No.47560/GS/TA/-3(a)/306-B/D(GS-VI) dated 19th February 1985 and letter of even number dated 8th September 1992 on the incentives by State Governments to Territorial Army personnel. 2. Most State Governments have instituted some cash awards/grants for the winners of Territorial Army decorations/Medals. However, these awards were instituted a long time back and have been rendered insignificant by inflation. In many States, this reward is limited to Rs.2500/1500 only. It is requested that this may be revised to a minimum of Rs.5000/- for TA decorations and Rs.3000/- for TA medals. Some State Governments have already made the revision. 3 Government of India had also recommended that the facilities listed below may be considered for Territorial Army personnel. These incentives were listed by a committee which was set up to go into the Territorial Army and are already being given by most State Governments :- (a ) Grant of 01 increment for every 03 years Territorial Army service, as is being given by the Government of Uttar Pradesh. (b) Counting of Territorial Army embodied service for purposes of seniority, promotion and other considerations to those entering civil services. (c) Exemption of Road tax on vehicles owned by Territorial Army personnel as is being given by west Bengal Government. Yours faithfully, Sd/xxxx- (S.K. JAIN) Joint Secretary (G). Soldier’s Appeal;- With outmost respect It is solemnly Prayed to;- Advice how legally begin this case With SAIL for Honoring Ministry of Defense GOI letter No.. 47560/43/TA-(a)///D(GS-1/dated 7.01.1994 with due Consideration of my requisition within the legal precincts of this GOI letter Humbly stated that It is -“NOT the case of Protection of PAY Basic + DA” Concise summary of Case;- . On the intrinsic worth of Military Medal’s & Decoration creditably awarded for the commendable Operational Field service in high intensity ANTI TERRORIST & Counter Insurgency i was directly selected & appointed as as Manager– Security SAIL VISL. Solitary on the Basis of 13 years meritorious military Commissioned service, as INFANTRY officer, Reckon able in the rank of “substantive MAJOR. against the OPEN advertisement As per the Recruitment advertisement of SAIL VISL, ;- minimum requirement was 10 years in Army/Air force/Navy/Para-military as a commissioned other with the last post held being at least in the cadre of captain or equivalent. Benefits: Apart from basic pay, DA and other benefits are admissible under SAIL Rule. . My requisition is legally with in the ambit & scope of GOI order, previously forwarded through proper channel to SAIL office . DPE Guidelines/Policy of GOI are wholly applicable on SAIL, & honoring them will incur No Losses/damage or any extra exchequer to SAIL it being the only such case in VISL, within the preview of SAIL recruitment rules which approves maximum of 06 increments com mensuration to qualification experiences & specialization etc Honorable Supreme Court of INDIA : - while dismissing the appeal on 01 April 10, a bench Of Justices Markandeya Katju and A K Patnaik slammed the Government PSU’s for treating army Personnel like “beggars” in respect of emoluments. even It has been held by Supreme Court that” Undoubtedly, the Defence Personnel are a class by themselves” {Common Cause Case ,1987 (1) SCC 142] but still no justice SAIL is neither denying nor granting these benefits for my prior military service LT COLONEL R S Shekhawat SAIL VISL security 09449833730

Siddharth Sharma says : Terrace Rights - New Delhi
Sir, I request your opinion on a matter that has cropped very recently. I am a resident in an apartment constructed by a builder in 1986 situated in South Delhi. There are 3 floors - Ground, 1st & 2nd with each floor having 2 flats and also there is 1 basement. The builder sold the flats and kept the basement. I have limited knowledge of the law but if I remember correctly as per the law in 1986 the roof was open and deemed for common use (as you could not construct beyond the 2nd floor) and we were all allotted a servant quarter on the roof with a common toilet for use of all 6 flat owners. Now with changes in the building by laws the builder has claimed ownership of the third floor (terrace) and we have come to know that he has sold the terrace to someone and the supposed new owners are saying they will build a 3rd floor. My question is that as per the laws that were there in 1986, the terrace was to be in a common area so now even with changes how can anyone claim ownership let alone sell it to anyone. All us 6 flat owners are united on this and are against any construction as we feel that even structurally this building is almost 30 years old and cannot support another floor. In my title deed of 1986 (I own 1 flat on the first floor) I have been given access and equal ownership of the common area which would include an equal share of the terrace (3rd floor) besides my servant quarter. The title deed is silent on the ownership of the terrace (third floor) just says that we we have equal ownership of the common area and a proportionate share of the land on which the flats are constructed. We wanted to know what right do we have to prevent any construction on the third floor. We are all ordinary residents so needed your advice as to what preeptive action we can take to prevent any illegal construction on our terrace (third floor) Kind Regards, Siddharth ssharma1979@gmail.com

Yukte says : Relieving letter and salary withheld
Hi Rajeev, I have served my complete notice period of 90 days (Last working day 30th March) as per my company's policy and have cleared the no dues as well. My previous company's policy stated that I will be relieved in 45 - 60 days. Firstly when I inquired about my FnF on 50th day, the Finance team updated me that my clearance documents were submitted late by my manager because of which I will be relieved by 70 days. On 71st day I am being informed that there was an error in the clearance form and my manager withdrew the previous form and re-submitted a new form which is why it will take longer. Its been 72 days since my last working day, I have not yet received my relieving or my last salary. HR is avoiding telephonic conversation with me and are only reverting on mails.My Manager said he will follow up but has not given me any reply. It seems everyone is just postponing the matter because they tried retaining me quite a lot. What action can I take to get my FnF and relieving?

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799