LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More



adv. rajeev ( rajoo )'s Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 7714

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    I can answer any type of questions relating to civil, criminal, consumer, and other laws

    My area of expertise
    income tax, company law, civil cases, accounts, criminal, labour,accident cases,

    My experience in the area (years):
    15

    Organizations I belong to:
    self employed

    Publications or writing which has appeared :


    Educational credentials:


    Award & Honors:


  • VENKATA RAMANA MURTY INGUVA says : Arbitration
    We are Contractors and due to dispute - Railway has appointed 3 member Arbitration Pannel for solving the problem. However, they conducted two meetings and could not come to an judgement. After 2 meeting and after lapsing of 8 months no futher meeting are carried by them and not responding to our letters for the same and delayig the case further. In this circumstances what will be the course of action will be taken by us to solve the problem. Your valuable reply is appreciated. Further The apex court also disapproved the practice of bureaucrats appointed as arbitrator, being frequently transferred resulted in delaying the arbitration. How to proceed to change bureacrat arbitrator to be replaced by Court Appointed Arbitrators. Than you. Thanking you.- I.V.R.MURTY

  • sandip says : moot problem
    sir i am final year student of law and no experience of preparing moot court. sir please help me for preparing the below moot problem. On january 1, 2005 one ramesh while he was travelling from bangalore to pune by chennamma express was detained at belgaum railway station by the railway police and a suitcase containing a sum of rs. 5,00,000/- was seized from him on the suspicion case under section 411 ipc read with sections 41 and 102 of the cr.p.c was registered against him. Meanwhile intimation about the seizure of money was sent to the incomce tax authorities at belgaum on 2nd january 2005. On 4th january 2005, the income tax inspector belgaum sent an information to the commissioner, income tax department, belgaum about the fact of possession of aforesaid amount by ramesh and also that he did not have any papers and document regarding the ownership and possession of the amount. the commissioner issued a warrant of authorization under section 132a of the income tax act, 1961 on the basis of which the income tax officer sent a letter of requisition to the station officer incharge, railway police belgaum requiring the station house officer to hand over the seized sum of money to him(incom tax officer) who had been aouthrized by warrant of authorization to receive it. Meanwhile the railway police after completing the investigation submitted the final report on 15th january, 2005 wherein it was stated that the money found in the possession of ramesh did not represent stolen property or property acquired from any offence. Ramesh moved an application before the railway magistrate, belgaum praying that the money which had been recovered from his possession, be returned to him as it was not required for the purpose of any enquiry or trial. he further relied upon the fact that the railway police had given a final report in his favour. In these facts and circumstances, argue on the application filed by shri ramesh on behalf of the applicatn as well as on behafl of the income tax department. please rply me on my email id patilsandip975@gmail.com

  • harpreet says :
    hi sir i want to know....i have done central govt job for 1yr and now i'm doing state govt job ...will the job done in central govt be considered for retirement benefit?

  • usif Magsi says : Injunction
    Hi, Raajev my cell No is 0333 750 1023, Pakistan, and my mail address is Usifshahghazi@gmail.com/yahoo.com/hotmail.com

  • usif Magsi says : injunction
    Hi, Raajev ur name is sweet, I am new to the civil law, the aim of me to join civil law is to create a civilized society, and to get the relief in the civil side, and using civil law, but not to get the FIRs registered as to harass the whole family, if any one commits an offence he may be punished, but if u support me , I shall work in civil side,

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799