adv. rajeev ( rajoo )'s Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 7714

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Rajan says : Christian Divorce
We lived only for 45 days in 1999 and then 'she' deserted me. To avoid threat to my life and to my family, I filed the divorce application in 2001 based on the hospital primary evidence of conspired design with mala fide intention of proving distorted names and wrong profession and address of the husband / father of the child she delivered in 34 weeks but fully grown baby. Based on this I have filed the divorce of 'pregnancy before marriage' and 'unconsumed marriage', however in 2004 she filed for a DNA test as a reply I filed that I am willing to submit to the tests provided she gives divorce and also the court to look into the documentary evidence of name distortion and change of particulars. After 10 long years, in the open court she accepted that with her other intentions she had distorted the particulars in the hospital documents and she pleaded guilty and the same day, I accepted paternity of the child in writing vide a memo in Nov 2009, that was accepted by the court. As an after thought, she is insisting for a DNA test inspite of acceptance of the paternity and the court also has passed an order for paternity test inspite of acceptance of the paternity in writing and without checking the primary documentary evidence of the hospital records. Can you advice me, if the order is correct and can the court order for the test that has been accepted in writing for the sake of the females egoistic attitude. Since I have accepted the paternity in writing vide a memo, can i seek any relief from the DNA test order However, the primary root cause was providing wrong information in the hospital records (based on the hospital primary evidence of conspired design with mala fide intention of proving distorted names and wrong profession and address of the husband / father of the child she delivered in 34 weeks but fully grown baby). Nonetheless, it took nearly 10 years to accept the fault and plead guilty in the court of law by her. After her pleading guilty I have writing accepted the paternity of the child (moreover most of the time I was requesting the court to provide me the guardianship of the child) while the case was being heard. My inquiry: - When the paternity is accepted, is there any necessity to prove what was accepted? - When the documentary evidence of the hospital records are still available with different name, even after acceptance why should I be penalized to undergo tests? - Wont the facts admitted need to be proved again? Kindly advice Thanks and regards

saurabh says : help needed
Respected sir I am surabh and fighting a civil case against my paternal uncles regarding a property on the name of my grandma which she had given to me through a registered will duly signed by her My uncles have spun a web arnd me and its difficult for me to survive it. My grandma wrote a will in my favour.We are living in the said property.My uncles wen came to know abt this asked us to give them a portion of the house.We agreed in return of NOCs.They didnt give it to us so we refused.Then they went to the court.During the case we came to know that they have another unregistered will signed by my grandma.But we have got it checked.The witnesses havent signed it in front of my grandma(ink test).Also the name of the will maker/notary isnt there.Our will stands all the scrutiny. My dad is no more.And I am the sole earning member of the family.One more thing worth mentioning is that they made a appeal against the will after 12 yrs of it being signed and we have proof which says that they knew abt the signed will.They are feigning full memory loss regarding this which obviously is a farce. They went for a one sided stay on the house 2 yrs back and they got it. Our lawyer fought for it and then the stay was rejected on the grounds of insufficient documents in favour of the plaintiffs.The case proceeded in the session court and now its in the stage of the cross examinations and my uncles are continuously ditching the proceedings.They are NRIs.Half of the time they arent in the country and the remaining time wen they are they never show up in the court. We tried to use the ex-parte term in our favor.Because of that they came to the court once...showed their face and then again became unavailable. Within a month or two they again have to go back..We are damn sure they wont show up in court till then and then after going their excuse will be that they are out of the country.Again we will we hung in mid air. Now they have even gone to high court to appeal against the removal of the stay on the house.If the situations turns real bad and again the stay is implied we will again be struck and this time for a longer period. Hence I am planning to sell the saidf property and wanted to know the consequences in dtail which I can face if I sell the said property. I want to have a through knowledge of the situations civil and criminal awaiting me in case I go ahead with this step.They are super rich and I wont be able to afford the fees of both the courts for much longer.Hence want to get out of the said property but dont want to enter into more serious legal problems. Thanks a lot for giving me your precious time.I am real depressed right now and your advice can go a long way to help me out from this mess. Awaiting your reply. Regards Saurabh

shrikant chede says : theft case u/s 135 of I.E.Act
Electricity theft is detected under section 135 of Indian Elecricity ACT 2003 The accussed pay the assesment amount and compounding charges in order to avoid lodging of F.I.R . afterward made complaint to electrical inspector under section 127 of Indian Elecricity ACT 2003 , In above Act electrical inspector has no power to deal with matter connected with section 135 ,the elecrical inspector givesorder to refund the money to the accussed ,In this senario what should bedone? is it advissable to file writ in Hon'ble High court to quash the order issued by the elecrical inspector ,who has no power in law to pass the order What is the procedure to quash the order issued by incompetant Authority Thanks in advance for reply

Mr Sreejit says : sos - criminal lawyer required
me in kolkata need to file a case against WB Govt Home (Police) in dire need of an expert criminal lawyer.Pls guide me asap. Thanks Sridhar 09830928232

Avinash says : U/s 133 adjudication pending.
I have sent complaint to Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police for illegal running of Auto repairing and Auto puncture shop and establishment of compressor machine in main room thereby creating air pollution, noise pollution and threat to my family member lives also, in residential flats Dilshad Garden, DDA Flats. Consequently, SHO Seema Puri has taken action & prepared Kalandra U/s 133 crpc and forwarded to S.D.M. Seema Puri for necessary action. SDM has served the notice to both parties and asked to appear on 10/3/2010. Defendant party come with pleader and his advocate ask for copies of complaint, nature of the case. N.D.Hearing was on 23/3/2010. On dated 23/3/2010, Defendant party replied against my complaint. N.D. hearing was 13/4/2010. On dated 13/4/2010, I have submitted the replication prepared by my advocate along with action report of Delhi pollution Control Committee which forwarded to Commissioner of Industry and Commissioner of Industry action report forwarded to Deputy Commissioner, North East District, Nand Nagri, Delhi for necessary action, even M.C.D south Zone has issued sealing notice to above mentioned Auto repair Shop owner. Despite of submission of four govt. authorityâ€™s necessary action letter alongwith replication. SDM asked to prove the public nuisance. It is a private nuisance, you are the only victim. Unless it is proved the publice nuisance. I will not able to take action. Whilst, my advocate says that if a single person is affected by nuisance then it is public nuisance, he is having judgment of Supreme Court for the same. Queries. 1. Under the circumstances same nature of case pending in Karkardooma Court. Does S.D.M empowered U/s 133 crpc to give adjudication without hesitation.

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799