adv. rajeev ( rajoo )'s Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 7714

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

shrikant chede says : URGENT
URGENT RESPECTED MEMBERS, ONE OF OUR EMPLOYEE A CONSTUCTED HOUSE AT NAGPUR AND FOR THAT TOOK LOAN FROM CREDIT COOPRATIVE SOCIETY FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF OFFICE ,EMPLOYEE A CLAIM BENIFIT U/SEC24-A AND 80 -C AS PER INCOME TAX ACT 1961 THE OFFICE REFUSE TO GIVE BENIFITAS ABOVE AND ADVISE EMPLOYEE GET RETURN FROM INCOME TAX DEPARMENT MY QUESTION IS 1) WHETHER IS IT MANDATORY TO CONFER/GRANT BENIFIT AS CLAIMED ABOVE 2)IS THE ACTION OF MY IS LEGAL

gaurav says : SARFAESI SALE ...BANK ISNT GIVING SALE CERTIFICAT
hello sir, please advise me.on 5 march 2010 i bought a house on auction under SARFAESI ACT being the lone highest bidder and my price being over reserve price my bid was accepted n i was given a letter asking me to deposit 25% of sale price on the same day n remaing 75% in next 15days ie by 20/3/2010.(((it had a clause stating the bank can cancel my bid before i deposit the remaining 75% amount))) i deposited the remaining amount beforehand ie on 12/3/2010 n asked the bank for releasing sale certificate as per SARFAESI ACT the bank people didnt give sale certificate instead when i gave them an application for the same on 29/3/2010 on 30th march i recievd a cancellation letter dated 27 march with a check dated 25 march cancellation letter of the bid(earlier accepted and fully paid already) after 10 days of the deadline!!! and 18 days after full money deposition!!! with a payorder of the whole money by courier.it says"the bank has decided/authority has decided not to sell the property" the bank has cancelled after my depositing the whole amount which is against its own clause what should i do to get the sale certificate n the possesion of property.please advise.....thanks so much for your attention n time....

shivraj says : CIVIL LAW
Under the specific relief act In pending execution procedure can Judgment debtor sale out his property to third person and create third party interest? In this circumstances the purchaser can save his right over suit property any remedy legal remedy to protect the third party like as a bonafide purchaser? Plz help me and give me ur valuable opinion to solve this problem and any references case laws relating this case Thank u.

Praveen Kumar says : Your reply to the question can any random lawyer..
Thank you Mr. Rajeev. I am not worried about the fact that anybody can randomly represent the opposite party. My question is whether on that grounds can I ask the judge not to accept a plea for adjournment that the plea being asked for is not by the original lawyer. Because if you see in the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005, it clearly states that the mere absence of the opposite party lawyer is not reason for adjournment. Because in this case the opposite party lawyer can continuously ask his peon to find a lawyer in the court and keep filing the memos without as much as even coming to the court. How is that fair? When the complainant, and that too when it is in person, is expected to come for every hearing, should'nt the lawyer on record also come even if it is to only ask for adjournment and that too an ajournment to file a version leave alone anything else?

Mohit chawla says : Sec. 363 & 366 IPC
Hello Sir. Will you please suggest something on this query. Raj Kumar a male hindu aged 25years was teacher of Saqina- a muslim girl. Saqina was student of 10+2. Both of them fell in love with each other. Raj Kumar used to tell her that Hinduism is a good religion. One day both of them eloped and Saqina converted to Hindu religion. The same day they got married in a Arya Samaj temple. Saqina's parents got an FIR registered against Raj Kumar u/s 363 & 366 of IPC. They alleged that girl is a minor. The parents of the girl produced a certificate of Municipal Corporation showing that girl is a minor. 6 months later the police apprehended the couple. By that time Saqina was pregnant. The accused prodused Saqina's school certificate as per which she was a mojor when they got married. Law points to be discussed: 1. Validity of marriage. 2. Consent of the girl. 3. Charges of Sections 363 & 366 of IPC. 4. Conflicting birth certificates. 5. present situation when the girl is pregnant. Discuss the matter and please suggest some decisive and latest authorities.

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799