A V Vishal's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 5092

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

sandip says : moot problem
sir i am final year student of law and no experience of preparing moot court. sir please help me for preparing the below moot problem. On january 1, 2005 one ramesh while he was travelling from bangalore to pune by chennamma express was detained at belgaum railway station by the railway police and a suitcase containing a sum of rs. 5,00,000/- was seized from him on the suspicion case under section 411 ipc read with sections 41 and 102 of the cr.p.c was registered against him. Meanwhile intimation about the seizure of money was sent to the incomce tax authorities at belgaum on 2nd january 2005. On 4th january 2005, the income tax inspector belgaum sent an information to the commissioner, income tax department, belgaum about the fact of possession of aforesaid amount by ramesh and also that he did not have any papers and document regarding the ownership and possession of the amount. the commissioner issued a warrant of authorization under section 132a of the income tax act, 1961 on the basis of which the income tax officer sent a letter of requisition to the station officer incharge, railway police belgaum requiring the station house officer to hand over the seized sum of money to him(incom tax officer) who had been aouthrized by warrant of authorization to receive it. Meanwhile the railway police after completing the investigation submitted the final report on 15th january, 2005 wherein it was stated that the money found in the possession of ramesh did not represent stolen property or property acquired from any offence. Ramesh moved an application before the railway magistrate, belgaum praying that the money which had been recovered from his possession, be returned to him as it was not required for the purpose of any enquiry or trial. he further relied upon the fact that the railway police had given a final report in his favour. In these facts and circumstances, argue on the application filed by shri ramesh on behalf of the applicatn as well as on behafl of the income tax department. please rply me on my email id patilsandip975@gmail.com

RajAnand says : Cast Iron Case
Sir, Can u please explain the term "cast iron case"... Thanks in advance.

pulkit says : FORM "h"
We are having only local VAT TIN. Now, we want to sales against form H "WITHIN STATE" whether it is possible or not without Central Act Registration no.????

tushar says : accident
dear sir, we (2 persons)suffered motor car accident on 23rd jan, 2011, filed complaint on the same day, now we want to file case against the offender, kindly advice, rgds, tushar

anil says :
I m a student of law & no experience of preparing moot court case prepare for moot court. can any one Please help me to Prepare Moot court case file ? I would really be thankful for any kind of help. A is working as a Driver with the Managing Director (MD) of Food Corporation of India (FCI), a central govt. undertaking for the past five year at Chandigarh. On a usual day of work, the MD instructed the driver to get some important document signed from the Ambala Branch. The MD added that he must report back to duty before noon the same day. R, a Driver in a private concern- Jayco Co. A’s cousin used to live with him. When R came to know about A’s visit to Ambala the next morning, he offered him lift as he was also going to Ambala for Co’s work. A agreed to accompany him and the two started in Jayco’s Co car at 8 am. On reaching Ambala, R dropped A at the FCI branch while he himself accomplished Co’s task, on his way back. R picked A and started journey back to Chandigarh at around 10.30 am On the way back, near Derabassi, A insisted R to let him drive, as it is not very far off and also that R should take some rest. After much insistence, R yielded and handed over the steering wheel to A. A drove at high speed and the vehicle could not be controlled by him. As a result, at a blind turn, the car collided head on with taxi approaching them from the opposite side. Two passengers alongwith a child and taxi driver got severe injuries. In this accident whereas A died on the spot and R died on the way to the hospital. Legal heirs of A filed case against FCI. Legal heirs of R and Jayco Co are filing cases against legal heirs of A and FCI. Taxi driver and passengers are filing cases against R, Jayco Co, A and FCI. ARGUE FOR LEGAL HEIRS OF R and Jayco Co.

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799