A V Vishal's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 5092

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Anshu says : Spelling mistake in Apartment Deed
Respected Sir, We purchased a new flat in Jun 2009 jointly with my husband and its registry + apartment deed was done in Jun 2009. We have taken the posession of the flat. Recently, we got all the documents from the builder and we noticed that there is a typing mistake in my sirname in Apartment Deed document howevr my husband's full name is mentioned correctly ( he is second holder). My sirname is mentioned as "Tondon" instaed of "Tandon". Though Index II page is written in Hindi and here the name is correct. Will this create problems in selling the flat in future and Is it necessary to go for correction deed? Thanks.

Anupa Chakrabarti says : tRANSFER OF PART OWNERSHIP
My husband died last year . He purchased a flat in his own name and registration was not done before his death. I am told that In my husband's absence I have 1/4th share, the other shares being held ny my 2 minor daughters & my mother-in-law. Now my mother-in-law wants to give her share in favour of my 2 daughters under the condition that the flat cannot be sold until my younger daughter reaches 21 yeras of age. How will my mother-in-law transfer her portion to my daughters' name - 1.on a non judicial stamp paper? 2.if yes, rS. 10, 20, 50- which stamp paper- how should I decide? 3. It should be signed by how many witnesses? 4.Should it then be registered? 5. Is anything more is needed?

Member (Account Deleted) says : Unauthorized access and modification of electronic
Dear Sir, I am Mahesh Bollu s/o B.Ramaiah aged 35 and reside at 138, First Floor, First Cross, Yamlur, Bangalore 560037 I was working at Motorola , USA ( Libertyville ) from August 1999 to January 2002 and during my employment, I had accumulated a credit of around US $ 14000/- in my retirement savings account (referred to as 401K account). The amount represents part of my salary earnings voluntarily invested in the 401K account as long term savings and the matching employerâ€™s contribution. (Like PF Accounts in India ). During the registration of the account, my permanent address in India was given as 3-1-19 , State Bank Street, Nayudupeta, Andhra Pradesh , India , 524126. After I returned to India around 2002, the said 401K account under my Social Security Number 019822807 continued as an investment. In June 2008, I got a mail notification from Motorola that my permanent address for the 401K account had been changed to Plot 1/A, Vasundhara Enclave, Information Colony, Hyathnagar, Hyderabad . I had not initiated this change and hence I tried to log into my 401K account on the web to find out how the change had been effected. I then found that my account was not accessible by me under my log in ID and password. It appeared that the password had been altered along with the security questions by some unknown persons making it impossible for me to access the account. This was caused by an unauthorized access to the account and unauthorized modifications of data belonging to me. Since then, I have been in correspondence with Motorola to find a solution to the loss of my access to the account. After a long investigation, Motorola has now confirmed that the account information was not only accessed, but instructions were given for change of my address and then instructions were also given for termination of the account and sending of the proceeds to the new address. Motorola had sent the proceeds of the account by a cheque in the name of Mahesh Bollu but mailed to the alternate address mentioned above. The cheque was drawn by â€¦â€¦ Trust Company on Citi Bank N A. India Deposit Service Mumbai, bearing number 0031564641 for US $ 8851.14 with the beneficiary name as â€œMahesh Bolluâ€. The cheque was collected on 2nd January 2009 , in clearing through some Bank in Hyderabad . Motorola and Northern Trust has since sent me scanned copies of the paid cheque (copy enclosed) but the details are not clearly visible on the copy and I have requested them to send me the details of the collecting Bank, and Branch. I have all along been corresponding with Motorola, raised my objection to the fraudulent withdrawal of the money. On June 18, 2009 , Motorola sent a communication through e-mail (Copy enclosed) indicating that a fraud investigation is set in motion at their end and it would take a few months to complete. On September 18, 2009 , fraud investigators at Motorola confirmed through e-mail (copy enclosed) that a fraud investigation has commenced and it would take around 90 days to be completed. I have requested for the IP address from which the account was accessed for the fraudulent changes . Motorola confirmed that the cheque was mailed to the address at Plot 1/A, Vasundhara Enclave, Information Colony, Hyathnagar, Hyderabad . A complaint has been sent to FBI Internet Fraud department to facilitate the investigation in USA . However, since the persons who have hacked into the 401K account are now suspected to be in India and that the proceeds of the fraud has been encashed through a Bank in Hyderabad, I have been constrained to file the complaint in Bangalore where I reside. I request you to kindly investigate the identities of the persons who have fraudulently accessed the account, made alteration of access information, given instructions for withdrawal etc through Internet and also the identities of the persons who have encashed the cheque which was known to have been drawn in my name but encashed by some body else. Since the offence involves unauthorized access of information residing inside the computer, with the use of at least one computer located in India, and a wrongful loss has been caused to me as a result of such unauthorized access, an offence under Section 66 of Information Technology Act 2000 has been apparently made out probably with other violations. Since the fraud investigation at Motorola commenced only in August 2009 and it was only recently that I was informed that the case has to be filed in India , I was not able to make the complaint earlier. Sir i need your guidence to register the complaint with cyber police bangalore, i dont know exactly whom to meet and submit the complaint and if i go alone then they may not accept the case.

MANOJ KUMAR BANSAL says : Non Acceptance of Affidavit
assessing officer has not accepted the Affidavit provided to him in case of Gift by Donor. I understand the onus to prove that the affidavit is false lies on Assessing officer. How we can take him in civil and income tax to reject the affidavit which is true Manoj

MANOJ KUMAR BANSAL says : Non Acceptance of Affidavit
Assessing officer has rejected the affidavit provided by the donor in gift while assessing in I.T Act 1961. Which cases we can ask the assessing officer to prove that the affidavit is false.

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799