Manish Singh's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 1400

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Shamsheer Pal Singh Dhillon says : can u help me?
querry- 1.Can ahindu widow claim rights on the personal property or ancestral property of her husabd?under wat law or provision. 2. Can a hindu husband write a will righting off her wife and giving everythig to his sons? wat sec or provision?

Swapnil S.Sawant. says :
Hi Respected, => There r 4 Brothers and 3 Sisters... => All 3 sisters wants to give (relinquish) their right,title,share in father's property to,infavour of specific one brother only,..and not to remaining 3 brothers. => Now....the Question is... Whether all 3 sisters can give their share to only 1 brother excluding other 3 brothers ???

Neville says : Limitation Law 1963
Hello, I am interested in knowing about this Limitation Act 1963. 1. Are there any amendments to this act. 2. What are the terms under which a person who has possession of a plot of land can stake his / her claim on the property. 3. What is the procedure to be adopted for staking claim under this act. 4. What are points to be taken care while staking claim. I look forward to your reply. Regard Neville Da Silva Mumbai

Mohammed siraj zariwala says : please give your advice for 138
138 dishonored of forged rubber stamp cheque Which was stolen and kept by expartner of a company bears single signature *****Mr x was a partner in co at the time of his retirement dispute arised and they settle the matter with the panch (Freinds). panch made the settlement on plain paper with all signatory to settle the amount for Rs 5000000 to be paid to mr x for retirement in 3months period After some 45 days accordingly in front of the panch and their legal advocate the dispute was settle and transaction was settle mr x sign the deed of retirement on stamp paper made by their legal advocate in which it was clearly mentioned that full and final settlement and nothing is due to mr x at the time of his retirement and the last amount of settlement rs 300000/- given in cheque to mr x for which he provided the receipt and 2more partner enter the company accused no 3 and 4 *** 1)Mr X had 10yrs old Blank cheque of accused no1 with single signature of accused no2 his brother which he had stolen when he was a partner of accused no1 *** 2)accused no1 co since its incorporation had signature of any two partners in bank for transaction Mr. X used this old blank and stolen cheque of company bearing single signature of accused no2 filled the cheque for rs 3500000 and put the duplicate rubber stamp of accused no1 and deposited in the bank to made a false 138 case As soon as cheque bounced before the action of complainant the accused no 3 file a complaint (case no 1) in the court for forgery of cheque under sec 156(3) against Mr x which put a duplicate rubber stamp of co and was a 10yrs old stolen blank cheque bearing single signature of accused no 2, certified by the bankers of accused no 1 that it was a 10 yrs old cheque. Order was passed against mr x and was arrested he tried to get the bail in session but was rejected on the ground since he was the ex partner of the company he was knowing the company bank transaction norms than why did he accept the single signature sign than Mr x went for quashing the matter in high court but was rejected but got the bail from high court *****case no2: for the same cheque 138 filed for cheque bouncing case by complainant mr x for Rs 3500000/-against the four accused given below: He had his bankerâ€™s cheque bounce receipt which mentioned 1) Payment stopped by the drawer 2) Drawers signature incomplete/requires Accused no1: Is the company Accused no2: partner of accused no1 and brother of complainant mr x (also ex partner of the accused no1) Accused no3: partner of accused no1 and son Of accused no2 Accused no4: partner of accused no1 and Son of accused no2 Present status of the matter : ****case no 1: mr x expired and the forgery case is also finish since the accused is no more ****case no 2: original complainant mr x expired and the case is run by substitute mr y his son Cheque is with the I.O and application had been filed by Mr y to start the case with secondary evidence Xerox of the cheque since I.O. is not sending the cheque to the 138court inspite of several reminder of the court. His application had been rejected and a fresh notice is issued to concerned police station to send the cheque to the 138 court Some advocates in lawyersclunindia had given answer that: N.I.ACT SECTION 138 DOES NOT ATTRACT HENCE NO CASE MADE OUT Than how come my case is still pending in 138 court Cani I apply for discharge of the matter or go for quashing if yes on which ground or judgment please advice

Rajinder Bhatia says : Peace meal
decisions of the courts. as per view this is a right of the accused while the court is denying the same.

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799