LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More



s.subramanian's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 5851

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    can answer queries on family laws,civil laws,criminal laws,constitution,arbitration and banking laws including sarfaesi act

    My area of expertise
    matrimonial laws,civil laws,criminal laws and constitutional matters

    My experience in the area (years):
    25 years

    Organizations I belong to:
    ssm law asociates in chennai,tamilnadu,india

    Publications or writing which has appeared :
    none

    Educational credentials:
    B.COM.B.L.

    Award & Honors:
    GOLD MEDALIST Of Madras University in 1984 in Hindu Law.Won nearly four medals and awards of the Madras University and The Bar Council Of Tamilnadu .Holder of the University First Rank in B.L. in 1984.

  • Dr Sangh Mittra says : Review Order on Judgement when action on Un-review
    I need your kind help. Would you please guide me. There is no one who would except you. Dr S M

  • shrikant says : IS IT RIGHT
    one cadidate pass the ITI trade exam and apply for apprentisship to the Maharashtra state Electricity Board in Janewary2005 and completed traning in october 2005 and get the certificate as"The candidate successfully completed Apprentisship in Maharashtra state Electricity Board ,Maharashtra state Electricity Board Trifurgated into three companies in month of june 2005 namely 1)Maharashtra state Electricity Distribution company limited 2)Maharashtra state Electricity Transmition company limited 3)Maharashtra state Electricity Genration company limited Maharashtra state Electricity Transmition company limited publish advetisement for recruitment of line helper in yr 2010 which mention that candidate should have apprentisship certificate of )Maharashtra state Electricity Transmition company limited or erstwhile MSEB ,The candidate sucessfully pass the written test as well as interveiw test at the time of joining &verfication of document Authority refuse to join him The the candidate file W.P before Honble high court my question is 1)whether the certificate granted By MSEDCL UNDER THE HEADING MSEB is vallid while company is formed 2)the candidate is taken apprentisship traning in MSEB AND COMPLETED IT IN MSEDCL AND GET THE CERTIFICATE OF MSEB whether candidate is entitle for appoinment or not

  • Ashu Arora says :
    Hi, Please advise me on below. I joined a company Quick Journeys and Discoveries Pvt Ltd in March 2011. I have the offer letter on company's letter head in a PDF document through company's official e-mail ID. I have worked with this company for the month of March and didn't found it a long term company and decided to look for another options. My employer came to know about it but still he offered me the salary cheque for the month of March but when i deposited the cheque in the bank, the very 3rd day i came to know that the cheque wasn't cleared because of stop payment order by the drawer. Later on the employer stopped my cab service as well. I have not resigned from the company yet, Since then i am chasing my employer by e-mails, phone etc. but he is not answering any of these. I want to know from my employer weather he want's me to still work with him or not secondly will he clear my outstanding salary for the month of March or not ? I know he can't terminate me without giving me a notice for a month or he has to give a month's gross salary in lieu. Please advise me how should i go on this? Thanks & Regards Ashu Arora.

  • RADHE SHYAM JHATWAL says : ABSORPTION OF MRO IN ASSOCIATES OF SBI
    DEAR SIR MYSELF RADHE SHYAM AND DOING JOB IN SBOP AS MARKETING & RECOVERY OFFICERS (RURAL) ON CONTRACT BASIS SINCE FROM 22.10.2007 WITH RENEWAL ON 22.10.2009 FOR 3 YEARS. THIS POLICY AND POST IS STARTED BY SBI IN 2005. ONE DAY ON 14.07.2010 SBI DECIDE TO ABSORB TO THESE OFFICERS AS REGULAR CADER AND IMPLIMENTED THIS AS ON 2.08.2010 BY GIVING JOINING LETTER,BUT SAME POST WHICH IS CREATED BY SBI IN SBI & ASSOCIATES NOT GIVING PERMISSION TO ITS ASSOCIATES TO REGULARISE THEM.WE ARE WAITING FOR RESPONCE FROM SINCE 02.08.2010. AS PER RULE PERMISSION IS NECESSARY FOR ITS ASSOCIATES DUE TO MAJOR SHARE HOLDER BETWEEN ITS ASSOCIATES.WHAT WILL WE DO ????? KINDLY SUGGEST US...THANKS A LOT

  • Rajiv Batra says : criminal law
    In a complaint case(PFA) ACMM has discharged an accused at precharge evidence but the SPP has filed an cr revision in the session saying that the in complaint case there is no proviosion for discharge. I have one citation(1972) 3 Supreme Court Cases 282 which says "If charge is found groundless on the face of the record, the accused is entitled for an order of discharge." I need some other citations ...

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799