LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More



s.subramanian's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 5851

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    can answer queries on family laws,civil laws,criminal laws,constitution,arbitration and banking laws including sarfaesi act

    My area of expertise
    matrimonial laws,civil laws,criminal laws and constitutional matters

    My experience in the area (years):
    25 years

    Organizations I belong to:
    ssm law asociates in chennai,tamilnadu,india

    Publications or writing which has appeared :
    none

    Educational credentials:
    B.COM.B.L.

    Award & Honors:
    GOLD MEDALIST Of Madras University in 1984 in Hindu Law.Won nearly four medals and awards of the Madras University and The Bar Council Of Tamilnadu .Holder of the University First Rank in B.L. in 1984.

  • Raj Kumar Makkad says : invitation
    Good Evening Friend! How are you? I have not heard from you since last many days. I a going to launch a free interactive legal site for sharing knowledge in the URL www.lawexpertsindia.com on 12th May 2012 at 11 AM in District Bar Association Hall Bhiwani (Haryana). I request you to become part of function as well as of this site as an expert. I do hope that your contribution shall be duly recognised by general public as well as legal luminaries.

  • supriya says :
    sir what are the licenses required in carrying automobile business?????i want the list of licenses used in automobile business and delearship..

  • Ram veer says : SC/ST recruitment reg.
    Respected Sir, I had applied for the post of Office Manager (Finance and Accounts) in Competition Commission of India (CCI), under the administrative control of Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, against their advertisement dated 30/09/2011 to fill up various posts, including Office Manager (F&A) belonging to Support Staff Category, through direct recruitment (third round). As per the advertisement, the selection process consisted of two parts – written test & interview. The whole selection process carried 100 marks, out of which 80 marks were for written test and remaining 20 marks were assigned for interview. A total of 55 marks out of 100 marks (written test plus interview) were qualifying standard for empanelment for unreserved category candidates, whereas a total of 50 marks were needed for candidates belonging to reserved category for empanelment. To qualify the written test, minimum 45 marks were to be secured by unreserved category candidates, while minimum 40 marks were needed to be secured by candidates belonging to reserved categories. In other words, there was relaxation of five marks (5 marks) for SC/ST candidates in the written part. But there was no relaxation for SC/ST candidates who appeared in interview. The SC/ST candidates had to secure 50 marks (40 Marks in written + 10 Marks in interview) out of 100 marks for final selection and unreserved candidate had to secure 55 marks (45 Marks in written +10 Marks in interview) out of 100 marks for final selection for the post of Office Manager (F&A). It is, therefore, evident that there was no relaxation of marks to the SC/ST candidates who appeared for interview as irrespective of the category (SC/ST/OBC/UR), a candidate had to secure 10 marks in interview considering the above proposition. The written test held on 22.01.2012 for the three (3) posts of Office Manager (F&A), including one (1) reserved for SC and One (1) reserved for ST (both are backlog).The result of the written test was declared by Competition Commission of India on 29.02.2012. I was declared successful in the written test and called for interview held on 23.03.2012. It is pertinent to mention here that I was the only candidate called for the interview against the post reserved for SC category candidates (backlog). The final result was declared by the CCI on 01.05.2012 by which I was not finally selected against the post reserved for SC candidate (backlog), by not extending any relaxation in interview for SC/ST candidates. The post reserved for SC (backlog) candidate remained unfilled continuously for the third time. Sir, I wanted to know whether the CCI recruitment process as per the constitution of India? I shall be grateful to your goodself if you could give your valuable advice in this matter. Thanking you in anticipation, Yours faithfully, (Ram Veer) soramveer@yahoo.in

  • Mr. Hitendra Shah says : Criminal
    If a POA is notarized on 01/02/2011 by Share Broker for its Client as he was providing finance in Margin Trading. It is notarized BLANK, through the Notary of the Broker, without filling in the details of Bank and Demat Account NUMBERS on the said Blank POA and it is handed over to Bank for accepting it and for verification. Bank accepts it Blank as verified and getting filled the account opening forms through the client via Broker on 04/04/2011. Bank opens Bank A/c of the client on 12/04/2011 and Demat A/c on 14/04/2011 and the account NUMBERS of the said accounts are filled in the said POA by the BANK in its own way. The Client clears all his dues along with interest on 14/09/2011 but the Broker sells all the Balance shares of the client after 14/09/2011 and realised money he transfers in other's A/c fraudulently with the help and support of the said Bank and POA holder of the client. The POA holder was Broker's one of the employees and signatories because the Broker provided Finance to the client in Margin Trading. I would like to know from the Experts that 1) Whether the said POA is Valid or Invalid because POA was notarized before the said accounts were got opened. POA was notarized on 1/2/2011 and Bank A/c was opened on 12/4/2011 and Demat A/c was opened on 14/4/2011? 2) whether the POA is valid document for the said accounts or whether the said accounts are valid for the said POA? 3) whether is it believed that POA was got Revoked as soon as the Bank filled in the invalid account numbers on the said POA? 4) Whether should the client file a civil case for his claims making party to the Broker or Bank or POA Holder? What is the best option in your opinion? Whether he should file case on Bank for the Claim? In this case I have few more queries that I would like to ask you in other part. Kindly explain me with your expert knowledge. Thanks. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2nd Part :- There was conspiracy between the Bank, Broker and POA Holder. With some reasons in the mind, the Broker and Bank got opened the Bank A/c of the client as if he is a Company or a Partnership firm by filling "Non Individual" Bank A/c opening form from the client. The Broker got signed from the client on the POA, at the bottom of POA, as Director/Secretary/Partner. Now the POA is in the Individual name of the Client and the Bank A/c is in the name of a Company or Partnership Firm. So whether the said POA is Valid or not? In the Bank A/c opening form there never be required to fill the details of POA Holder in the said form by POA Holder, but the Bank allowed illegally to POA Holder to fill the details of POA Holder on the said Form so that he can operate the said Bank A/c. The Broker and Banker got filled from the client "Corporate Internet Banking Form" for opening Internet Bank A/c of the client and got opened Corporate Internet Bank A/c of the client and similarly the POA Holder filled his details in the said form to operate the said A/c. The signature of the client on the POA and Demat A/c opening form differs significantly. In the POA he signed as S. J. Master and in the said Demat A/c opening form he signed as Shantilal Master. in such situation can POA holder operate the Demat A/c of the client? Kindly explain and guide to the client that how he should proceed? Thanks. ***************************************** Last and Remaining Part:- Sir, how the said POA be said valid when POA was notarized before the accounts were opened? In other 3 cases, in the verified POA, verified by the Bank, there is no detail of Demat A/c Number is mentioned on the POA but POA Holder has operated the said Demat accounts of the Clients. There was only one POA Holder in all the cases whereas the Demat accounts of the clients have been operated by other persons also signed as POA Holder.

  • PARVATHI KRISHNAN says : Legal advice to get job under compassiionate grou
    Sir..great Profile! I am parvathi from chennai..I need legal advice to proceed my effort to get job under compassionate ground of my father ..He was absconding on 30.06.1990.We file a FIR in local police..meanwhile my mother applied for job under compassionate ground ..But in office they adviced to come after 7 year with police certificate ..Mother followed his advice 7th year my mother also dead due to ill..Meantime one lady giving petition to father office and police for claiming my fathers benefit..She said that she was a second wife..Officer informed us to get a court decree and apply the benefits. We filed a case and get the court decree..1997 29 oct , my mother also dead due to ill. we are minor when my father was missed and we depend to relative after my mothers death.The court decree seems to be death get on 05.03.2004..we proceed a application for job under compassionate ground..officer adivced to us that the tamilnadu government ban the job from 2001. and give a requisition letter to return the HBA documents paid the dues..we followed... Today i was in very worse economical situation, i given a petition to my father office for job under compassionate ground..they sent a return letter for my petition that they refuse my requirement under three rules... that is (1)i was married (2) we are not applied with in 3 years (3) and my age limit overed 35yrs..These are the problems ..Sir please give a advice to https://plus.google.com/104052185836617982862get the job? What is the way to get ? shall i apply succession certificate to get the job?what is your best opinion for my case Parvathi krishnan

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799