non - obstante clause.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 14 April 2011 This query is : Open
Marutiudyog ltd vs. Ramlal (2005) 2 SC 638.
&
In CIT vs. B.R. Constructions (1999) 202 ITR 222 (AP) CFB.
&

SC in Ssouth India Corp Ltd vs. Secretary Borad of Revenue.

Required the hole case in detail pls any one provide me. it explain in depth of
It is not there in indiankoon.com so pls do the needful

The citation gives the non - obstante clause interpretation by the SC in depth.

Thanks.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Love spells to return your ex-lover back
Https://purewellnessketogummies.sites.kaltura.com/
Is it legal to buy property in panvel's usarli khurd area?
Purchase of goodwill for ca firm
False allegations
How to remove other right from agricultural land
Obc caste certificate
138 ni act
Justice denied
Malicious prosecution

Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Ucc laws on inheritance
Family settlement
Complaint against medical facility
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Legal notice or ........
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content
Validity of legal notice.....