LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Jamai Of Law (propra)     06 April 2011

'stay' by Appelate court Vs 'stay' by trial court

Please resolve the following confusion and doubts :-

 

 

Order 41, Rule 5 of CPC provides expressly about stay by appellate court on a proceeding and execution.

 

 

The same Order 41, Rule 5 of CPC also provides expressly about stay by court which passed the decree or order.

 

 

When an Order to 'stay the execution' is passed by either of the above courts, it is a direction to executing court.

 

But If the court which passed the decree is also the executing court, does/should it entertain the JD's prayer of 'stay of execution'? 

Or

Should it direct the JD to go to high court/appellate court?

 

 

Doesn't the trial court have inherent powers to stay the execution proceeding under 151, under extraordinary circumstances?

 

 

If any court has inherent powers to recall it own decress and orders under extraordinary circumstances, why not have the powers to stay the execution of orders decrees which is reopened and sub judice?

 

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/difference-between-Injunction-and-Stay-order-27352.asp



Learning

 3 Replies

pratik (self working)     06 April 2011

good question ?

niranjan (civil practice)     06 April 2011

As per O.41 rule 5(2) even if it is the executing court it can stay execution of decree passed by him.

kuldeep kumar (lawyer)     18 July 2011

if the court which passed a decree is itself executing decree then it can itself stay execution no need to send any other court.o21 r 26 is made for dealing with such situation when any other court is executing decree passed.ur question is not a serious question


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register