LEGAL DECISIONS:
Rajesh Kumar and Others v D.C.I.T. and
Others (SC)
Income Tax Act, 1961 – Appointment of an
auditor for special audit of accounts in terms
of s. 142(2A) – Held, Bombay High Court
and the Delhi High Court, are not correct in
classifying a direction issued under s. 142(2A)
of the Act as administrative in nature – When
the books of accounts have been produced
and examined, the assessing officer would
be proceeding to make the ultimate order of
assessment – An appeal against the order of
assessment would not serve any real purpose
as the appellate authority would not go into
such a question since the direction issued
under s. 142(2A) of the Act is not an appellate
order – Appeal allowed.
Another case:
. Messrs Sahara India Financial Corporation
Limited v CIT, Delhi, Central – I and others
(Del.)
Income Tax Act, 1961 – Order directing
Petitioners to have special audits conducted
under s. 142 (2A) relevant for the assessment
year 2003-04 – Held, direction to conduct a
special audit under s. 142 (2A) is not a final
order and does not determine any right,
obligation or liability of any of the parties
– There need not be such rigid compliance
with the principles of natural justice –
Decision taken to order a special audit under
s. 142 (2A) is unexceptionable, and given the
limited scope of jurisdiction, cannot interfere
in the order passed – Petitions dismissed.