Thank you sir.
here is the situation... let me know your views against each one of them.
B's father created a situation or trapped A or A's father for the want Rs. 100/- on a paper. Is it still DP4? but then B still possess Rs.100/- in her custody after marriage? is it a crime?
A never abused B but B lies 100 times saying that A beats B soas to make others believe? is it still 498a?
When B or B's father never gave dowry to A or A's father? why it attracts DP4?
when A or A's father demands dowry Rs. 100/- but after marriage there is no continuing offence ? and B took Rs. 100/- + more money from A? should it attract DP4 or 498a.
what actually constitutes primary evidence?
what actually corroborates secondary evidence?
regards