499 & 500 ipc

To convict some one under criminal defamation, it is necessary that the repution is harmed and the same was intended. What I am suggesting is that all of it should be at a macro level...I do not think case proven false by it self will be a ground for Defamation....

Regards

Chetan(dot)7679(at)gmail(dot)com

okies.

But why is it so ? crime whether macro or micro is a crime. Half murder or full murder if both punisable as attemt to murder or mrder has same punishment why not in this case as i satying in pune has been through high level of depression. the marriage being planned so that she can break the marraige and in term get divorce and compensation for her bf. have statement of her frends and also the ph no of her bf. have a telephonic record where my wife denies that she doesnt know that person, wher she has been continously talking to her. when finally we know her reality she files false allegations on me declaring marriage null or void and stateing me impotent. 

other than this have stement from her frenzs that she has been pulling a bad name for us in her society and has also affected our name and fame in our society and has also affected my honor too. So can u suggest now ?

Law is what is written....If you think you have suffucient evidence to prove harm caused to the reputation then you may proceed under this section....