prof s c pratihar (medical practitioner &legal studies) 19 November 2008
dear members,
--- the expression ' if the accused in any such case ,is not represented by a lawyer , occuring in subsection 2 of s. 317 crpc.---does it mean that merely because an absconding accused is represenred by a pleader, the trial against him can not be split up if his personal attendence in court is necessary?
K.C.Suresh (Advocate) 20 November 2008
If he is not avialble even after steps the case can split up. When an accused is absconding how can a pleader/counsel l stand on belf of him.
bhagwant (lawyer) 23 November 2008
you can adopt procedure u/s.299 Cr.P.C., followed by Sec.82 and 83 of same code, and there by record evidence in absence of accused.
Bhagwant Kale
Amardeep Garje (Junior) 09 November 2009
Is there any provision in CrPC or anywhere which governs Split of trial if yes then let me know???
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
