i think SC and ST can sell after 10 years within same SC/ST community...
https://landreforms.tn.gov.in/GOs/G.O_34.pdf
Example court Order for reference.....
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 18.05.2022 issued by the fifth respondent suspending the petitioner from service.
2. The petitioner has been suspended from service on the ground that as per G.O.Ms.No.34, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing (LD3(1)) Section dated 13.01.2021, only after obtaining a report from the Revenue Tahsildar, Revenue Divisional Officer and approval from the District Collector, the petitioner can issue patta. However, without getting such approvals, the petitioner has issued patta and on that ground the petitioner has been suspended from service.
3. The petitioner contends that as per the Regulations and RSO 21 as well as G.O.Ms.No.34 dated 13.01.2021, the Special Tashildar (ADW) is the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis authority assigned with duty to issue HSD patta for the SC/ST beneficiaries selected and approved by ADW department in D-Namunas. According to the petitioner, only by following the said procedure, he has issued patta and G.O.Ms.No.34 dated 13.01.2021 does not contemplate any approval from the District Collector. According to the petitioner, excepting for the impugned proceedings, there are no other complaints pending against him.
4. Counter has not been filed by the respondents in this writ petition.
5. Heard Mr.G.Sankaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 and Mr.Muthuswami, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent. By consent of both the parties, the main writ petition has been taken up for final disposal.
6. G.O.Ms.No.81 Human Resources Management (N) Department dated 04.08.2022 has framed guidelines for revocation/review of the suspension orders.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner will be satisfied if the petitioner's request for revocation of the suspension order is considered within a time frame to be fixed by this Court in the light of G.O.Ms.No.81 dated 04.08.2022 referred to supra. He would also submit that while considering the petitioner's request, a direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner's submission that under G.O.Ms.No.34 dated 13.01.2021, the question of getting approval from the District Collector will not arise.
8. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner is allowed to give a representation seeking for revocation of the impugned suspension order passed against him and on receipt of such representation, if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the same and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law in the light of G.O.Ms.No.81 dated 04.08.2022 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
9. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a representation to the fifth respondent requesting for revocation of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis impugned suspension order dated 18.05.2022 passed by the fifth respondent within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of such representation, the fifth respondent shall pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law in the light of G.O.Ms.No.81 Human Resources Management (N) Department dated 04.08.2022 within a period of four weeks thereafter after giving due consideration to the contentions of the petitioner that under G.O.Ms.No.34 dated 13.01.2021, there is no necessity for the petitioner to obtain prior approval from the District Collector for issuance of patta.
10. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
