irfan 05 May 2020
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 06 May 2020
Whether your sister was in physical relation with the same person ( proposed groom) with whom she has conceived or he is "some" other than him ?
Prima facie no legal issue is involved in your statement, it is better to opt for social and amicable settlement instead of legal recourse.
irfan 06 May 2020
P. Venu (Advocate) 06 May 2020
The facts posted suggest that the girl had consented physical relationship because of the assurance to marry. Subsequent events corroborate this aspect. But it would be better if an amicable settlement could be could be worked. In my opinion, what really matters of the girl who has been victimised.
G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.) 06 May 2020
The Bridegroom side are not opposing/rejecting/ suspecting the bride, but thinking of the social stigma of the appearance of a bride with six months of pregnancy during the marriage. Marriages can be performed during KOVID (in some states a maximum of 20 members are permitted), so it is better to perform a marriage within family members who are aware of the present bride's status. (Also take the opinion of doctor on the possible impact of such high antibiotic treatment during pregnancy, likely side effects and health of bride if she wishes to go for abortion at this stage). Both sides appear to be understanding and they have to arrive at a common point respecting other's view and the other is a qualified doctor.
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 06 May 2020
@ Irfan,
You have posted same query in forum also. See my reply.
However, it is ridiculous to repeat same story.