LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raju (Senior Executive)     06 February 2014

Affidavit substitution

In my case where I am the accussed  is at defence stage.. I noticed folowing problem. Please expert suggest some defense points...

 

1. Originally affidavit was moved by X, he stopped comming after few months.

2. After that Y came in place of X and submitted a new affidavit.

3. Both the affidavits of X and Y have the same common heading that is "Affidavit of complainant".

4. The new affidavit as filed by 'Y" has some material improvement and filed along with his SPA.

5. This new witness marked this SPA as Ex C1 and all other earlier exihibits number changed by one, that is Ex C1 became Ex c2 and so on.. For example cheque was Ex c3 in X affidavit but it became Ex c4 in Y affidavit.

6. Affidavit of X and all the exhiibits were signed by magistrate when X submitted this.

7. When Y gave the affidavit, there was new magistrate and there is no signature of this new magistrate on any of the newly changed numbered exhibits neither on Y affidavit, nor on SPA.

8. I had to cross Y under objection as another new magistrate wrote down the objection and instructed to cross him and stated in the order that merit of Y evidence shall be decided at the time of final argument.

 

Now the questions are:

 

1. Can oath commissioner (who certified the affidavit of Y) do so, when all the exhibits were already in the record of court. (please note that X had submitted all the exhibits earlier with his affidavit, Y changed the number by one and mentioned in his affidavit, now these documents could not have been seen by Oath commissioner.). 

2. Can the exhibit number changed by new witness in his affidavit ?

3. Can anyone become witness even if his name is not in the witness list ?

4. The overall procedure adopted by Y ? Is it as per law.

(no application was moved by Y, he just stated that X an employee has left the firm (proprietorship firm) and no longer interested in  prosecution), Y is also the husband of proprietor.



Learning

 2 Replies

LAXMINARAYAN - Sr Advocate. ( solve problems in criminal cases. lawproblems@gmail.com)     06 February 2014

Such situations occur in most criminal cases and have to be attended legally by proper counter action .

 

For proper guidelines or course of action actual records have to be seen.

RAJIV BHASIN (ADVOCATE) (Bhasin Legal Consultants(SOLICITORS & ADVOCATES) bhasin.laws@yahoo.com 9811210505)     06 February 2014

Dear Raju,

 

In your case two affidavits have been filed with different cheque details. Y cannot appear being matter of right. he has to take permission from the court for substitution only when  the complainant  is proprietorship concern. At later stage he cannot appear being husband of proprietor. proprietor has to prove her case and she being aware of all facts has to appear for evidence herself even for attorney holder complainant has to show her genuine inability for not appearing in court. you have to contest the case on technicalities. talk to your advocate in this regard. 

 

Rajiv Bhasin 

Bhasin Legal Consultants

SOLICITORS AND ADVOCATES

www.bhasinlegalconsultants.com 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading