@ Author
1. Your then behavior has been attributed to the condition called “anosognosia” following your stroke, is a neuropsychological presentation in which the affected person is unaware and unable to acknowledge disease in himself. It also often results in defects in reasoning, decision making, emotions, and feeling.
2. You shall do research on above subject matter picking American Jurisprudence materials especially of William Orville Douglas period. He is regarded as the most doctrinaire and committed civil libertarian ever to sit on the court.
3. Study Medicolegal Neurology cases. Interesting cases you will find but mostly related to granting immunity to prosicution of relatives against assisted death of neuro stoke / vegitative patients and may pick up arguments lines form there under law of torts (just my minority view since all cause of action as your defendant suits probably relates to the period when you were under brain stroke stage – right !) Every arguments hall take ld. court to that stage keeping in mind not present when you are much improved throuygh sheer will power when opposition thought to launch prosicution attack upon you !
4. This has been our argument again and again – the fact that someone has a disability at one point of time does not mean that they will not improve ever and in case a suit in hand dating to period of their disability now that person has improved he cannot be said to deny his right to defend of that lost period phase allegations by sheer recollection.
5. Seeking complete imuunity is a tricky part in initial stage of the trial and it all depends how your side puts forth arguments before a concious evolved Bench. Also the level of Bench is also to watch for seeking desired reliefs step by step. But it is also my opinion that ‘complete immunity’ may not come forward immediately that also at ld. trial court level for that may be the more higher forums you travel gainign experience on medicolegal aspect that is the core of your submissions in days to come some Bench will actually recognise what you pleadings are actuall all about and may give "partial relief"!
However it is also my view to bring in "subject experts" in intial phase of these two litigations to lead the way (means lay the foundation of your medical plea) instead of showing courage to plead as party -in- person. The crucial inputs of subject experts and daily Order sheet remarks of them will build up / make a good case when higher forums are approached is my minority view and with which I am not demoralising you in any way with my parting comment to cause title of this brief.
ATB + Rgds.