Zameer,
you seem to have a few misconceptions about laws...lemme try to clear them for you..
1. If a woman is earning she is not entitled for maintenance unless there is a huge difference in the husband and wife's paychecks...
2. If a woman is working and the husband files for a divorce on grounds of cruelty, adultery etc (where in the woman is at fault)...the husband can ask for maintenance and get it if he is not working or earning very less...
3. A wife cannot demand and walk away with her husband's or his family's assets the way you think...the only thing she is entitled to is the maintenance or compensation which again is not really huge...it i granted considering the financial status of the husband...
the amount is huge only in cases where the wife was subjected to so much cruelty that the news made headlines or was atleast reported in the news paper and there are enough medical evidences to support the same...and the compensation granted here is not just in DV case but in DV,498A,406,assault,generic harassment,intentional murder attempt, rape, unnatural rape and whatever other kind of crimes they might have resorted to..some times it may inlude extortion too, all being put together...and the amount is total of compensation awarded to the victim by each one of the convicts...
Now, assault, murder attempt, generic harassment and extrotion are the kind of crimes for which the court will award heavy penalty to the convicts irrespecive of the victim's gender...
so stop cribbing about this DV and 498A...
however, if the husband is not in a a position to pay the maintenance or compensation...that is when the court may entitle her to a SHARE of your property accordingly and you will not have to pay anything or may be pay lesser amount... and this again applies to any case and not just to DV or 498A...
but I am sure you have heard of DV cases in which the judgement was against the girl in the favor of the guy...so the law is not so biased after all..