Hi All,
Need small suggestion.
Every case have 2 parties and fight in court to proof Truth on incident. Many cases/incident had only one truth and both the Advocate try to proof their side. That means, any one of them is trying to proof his lies and divert the court from truth and kill the court time.
Example: if I make allegation of fight with other party and I have the proof/witness but the other party’s advocate is denies that allegation from base that no fighting was happened.
After proofing my allegation that I was saying truth than in that case, can we take some action against Advocate.? (My assumption that every Advocate know the truth of his client before go to court and he is only guide or misguide his client to make money)
Is there any provision in the constitution that we can challenge the lies or false allegation (like deformation) against advocate so next time the Advocate will file/fight to proof only truth from their end. Not to try to proof his lies.
Thanks and Regards,
Kais (9391344846)
