CAn you decide this simple case

(Guest)

Nothing but imaginations. Such examples are also made by God creatures in Satyanarayan Katha that; "Ek Kalawati thi.. usne Satyanarayan ki pooja ka prasad thukraaya so wo barbad ho gai and when she did pooja of Satyanarayan she again got back lost things.." Always choice given in such imagination stories to answer either "Yes" or "No".

Another example; "Ek tha Raam, he was good and Ek tha Raavan, he was bad.. Now give the answer who was good and who was bad..?"

Such imagination stories are also made by the Osama Bin Laden and being used by him for brain washing to set "Yes" or "No".

(Guest)

If a real case will be put up here than it will be useful otherwise such imaginations are only a time-pass like ludo. I felt my time is wasted while thrown to go through it.

Sher aaya.. Sher aaya.. Lion come.. Lion come.. and there was not even a rat but people disturbed just for a joke.

(Guest)

Originally posted by :Daljeet Singh
"	Hello Somani, Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:10.0pt;"Times New Roman";} I made the concurrent choice though I don't agree to majority- minority logic. I made the choice of letting the train go on its usual track because the children playing there would be alert for arrival of the train. It may be a riddle for westerns but not for us as it is normal course of the life here. Children use to play on tracks and roads, most of times prepared and alert for the traffic. I beg to differ with minority majority logic. From this riddle no generalization can be drawn to this effect. It would differ from case to case. Practically, no tracks are changed judging emotionally. When it comes to bigger "social" issues, usually the 'minority' and 'majority' interests are 'made' or 'flattened' to clash with each other. Normally, it is a rare condition when choice comes up as to crush either of the two. Say, if it is an issue of the 'democratic' society, then why to make a choice between either crushing more or less children. This is, I am sorry, ridiculous choice, for a society or community to make. A true democratic system would not make rules or guidelines to decide whom to crush for sake of whom? (As this riddle is suggesting.) It would make guidelines and arrangements for prohibiting the children to play on the track. For a democracy, the question should be - why lots of children don't have schools, parks and playgrounds not how to make choice whom to crush? A true democracy would invest in making schools, Parks and play grounds.	"