LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Vitthal (IT Consultant)     10 June 2010

Case against a Builder

 

I stay in a complex called Kores Nakshatra in Thane. I purchased the flat in Jan-2007. The agreement then suggested that there were to be 15 buildings in the complex & 2 gardens. Even the brochure suggested the same. In 2009 we got to know of the Builder's plans of constructing a new building in one of the gardens. We objected to the municipal corporation not to sanction the plans but eventually his plan got sanctioned. The corporation said that since the builder has constructed two public buildings for the corporation he was given additional TDR\FSI by the corporation. thats how they sanctioned the plans. We filed a case in lower court of Thane for injunction. Which has been rejected by the court today. I want to know from the learned friends here if there is any substance in our case to go forward for further appeal.

Following points could be of use.

1) The society formation is not yet complete although he has started the process since October 2009.

2) The agreement contains blanket consent for whatever the builder may want to do.

3) His plan are sanctioned by TMC despite our objections.

4) The agreement does not say that its a phase-wise project. Building 16 was not part of the original layout plan.

5) Our Advocate did not come up with strong points during the hearing.

Your suggestions are awaited with curiosity.

Regards

Vitthal Patil



Learning

 2 Replies

Nu.Delhi.Law.Fora. (Advocate-on-Record Supreme Court of India)     10 June 2010

Dear Sir,

Please ascertain as to what exactly the reasons/grounds upon which the Ld. Trial Court has based its judgment against you declining injunction against the builder.

Please also read between the lines of agreement that all of you had with the builder.

 

Club this two and you will get the answer.

For detail advice, please attach said judgment and copies of agreement, etc.

 

--
Thanks & regards.

Rabin Majumder
Advocate & Attorney
For NuDelhiLawFora
At:
Ch. 91, Sh. AK Sen Chambers Block,
Supreme Court of India
Also at:
Lawyers’ Consultation Room /
2nd Floor, Bar Room
Delhi High Court
New Delhi – 110003
+ 91 98992 59811
+ 91 9013307807
+ 91 11 65955548

email: nudelhilawfora@gmail.com


This e-mail transmission is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail transmission, it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, tribute, disclose or otherwise use the information in this e-mail transmission.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by emailing us or deleting this e-mail transmission as soon as possible.
 

Vitthal (IT Consultant)     12 June 2010

The court has based the judgment on the following points,

1) The Builder is the owner of the land.

2) The consent is already given by us(flat purchaser) in the sale agreement. There is a line in the agreement to that effect, which gives inequivocal consent to the builder for changing the layout plans\RG areas etc.

I do not have the soft copy of the judgement & the agreement. I would try to get those & send to you.

Regards. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register