Tanesh , a young professional looking for a reliable car, finds an attractive second-hand
vehicle listed online by a private seller named Mohan. The car appears to be in great
condition, with no visible damage, and Mohan assures Tanesh that it runs perfectly. Trusting
Mohan’s word, Tanesh buys the car without having it inspected by a mechanic. For the first
week, the car seems to be running smoothly. However, just a few days later, it breaks down
unexpectedly. After taking it to a mechanic, Tanesh discovers that the car has significant
engine problems that will require costly repairs.
Frustrated and feeling misled, Tanesh contacts Mohan to request a refund, arguing that
Mohan sold him a faulty car. Mohan, however, refuses, citing the principle of Caveat Emptor,
which means “let the buyer beware.” Mohan argues that it was Tom’s responsibility to
thoroughly inspect the car before purchasing it, and since Tanesh chose not to, the risk of any
hidden defects falls on him. Under the principle of Caveat Emptor (“let the buyer beware”),
can Tanesh hold Mohan responsible for selling a faulty car? What could Tanesh have done
differently to protect himself in this transaction?
