A judicial enquiry was ordered by High Court in a matter of Custodial Torture which was to be conducted by a Sessions Judge.
The Findings of the Enquiry have denied any such allegatiions taken place, but on going through the findings of tye enquiry it has been observed that there are many instances of false facts being used to deny justice to the aggreived.
Is there any judgements of High Court/Supreme Courts which state that a Judicial enquiry which is found to be based on wrong facts/ biased can be reordered or not considered by the Courts??
regards
Rahul