Dear Lawyers,
I am facing a private (Not a police resigiered) criminal trial for an alleged offence that I incited provocative words in a nearby locality in which the main accused is my acquaintance.
I could prove the trial court that I was not present at the time of scene using the rail tickets by which I travelled to Bhopal and that I indeed travelled beyond a reasonable doubt.
It seems to me that the prosecution now want to change the angle of analysing the crime so as to point the needle of suspicion to me only to nab me.
The trial began by the consent of the two Lawyers. The evidence has already been taken up by the court. After partially looking at the evidence, the prosecution got some new clues and they started looking at my rail tickets suspiciously.
Earlier the actual problem is that the original plaint has not been properly drafted by the prosecution and there are many loopholes in the prosecution claims themselves.
Can you please tell me whether the prosecution is allowed to change the plaint upon viewing the partial evidence put up by the defence side?
Thank you.
Deep
