A Chit Fund Company seemingly filed EP agaisnt the Orginal Debtor / Subscriber and all the Guarantors in one EP . The Chit Fund Company /DHR orally promised to the Orginal Debtor and other guarantors that they will nto execute the Warrant and informed the date and time of the Exectuoin Warrant and asked them to lock thier Houses ( though filed EP agaisnt them and obtained Moveable Warranta against all other Defendants) and wanted to execute the Moveabel Proerty attachment against one Guarantor only and pressurised one Guarantor only to pay the entire due amoutn , otherwise they will sieze the moveables and the said JDr promised to pay his part of the Due on that day and to drop the Proceedigns , the DHR/ Company not aqccepted the request of that JDr Guarantor and attached hsi properties , whether the DHr is justified and whther he can proceed againstg only one guarantor , though having same warrants in his hand against all the other JDr and original Debtor !
Friends I requst you to clarify
