Dear All,
Thanks to one and all for your kind information and support. We have appointed an advocate on this issue now. But want to keep an update here as our advocate has clearly mentioned that these kind of cases runs for years due to change in judges, adjournments from other party side and from our own sides too. He has provided an example with his running case which made us clear on the practicality.
Just to keep everyone updated so that experts can provide their valuable suggestions on the incident happended and found by us in the last one week:
-
The owner from whom we have bought in 2004 has borrowed money for his needs from a money lender and have given promisary note and which got executed in 2003. But for what so ever reasons, this did not appear in the EC when we have taken before purchase in 2004 nor did our ICICI bank legal team could find this when they approved the loan.
-
We purchased and immediately entered the house and living there since 2004 June onwards duly paying all taxes, EB, Water bill and Ration card details too updated to this address.
-
But Now in 2010 when we digged out this week with our advocate, it seems he has supressed the truth and sold this house to us and did not pay the money lender the obtained the amount from us too and settled the borrowed amounts. And unfortunately he has expired in 2005 july itself.
-
The money lender who has already executed the promisory note has been pleeding the honurable court to sell the house and settle his amount and hence the house has come for auction in 2007 itseems and at advanced stages of the auction during sale execution the ex-owner's(expired persons) wife had provided a petition to the court that the Auction for Sale should not be granted - but has not updated us too on the proceedings on the court matters
-
Now in the auction sale the money lenders - daughter in law itself has won the auction and paid Rs. 13.5 lakhs in the court and claiming the ownership of the property - and on moral grounds at this advance stages the wife(ex-owners wife) along with a court person has updated us and is telling that she does not know anything about his husbands borrowing of money as stated in her petition in the could in 2007 itself.
-
Our lawyer says that : we should first prove that we are a bonafide purchaser of the property without any encumberence in 2004 and with that the execution of the auction sale would be cancelled and money 13.5 lakhs would be returned to the daughter-in-law by the court. And then the money lenders money has to be settled in the court by the ex-owners legal heirs ex: wife etc, to clean up the encumberance attached to the property now.
But to be honest - I have not gone to work this week and totally upset with the law that - how can all this happen for almost 9 to 10 years without any intimated to us - as we are very well staying in the same address of the purchased house. Did'nt we have the intimation from the court atleast that our property is going for auction though our advocate said that it could be an act of the money lender which might need to be proved with sufficient evidence.
My parents are bit old and I do not want to give any sufferings at this age. Already they are totally upset and shocked - all I wanted to know is - will the law be fair as we have developed a fear and no hope situations based on our advocates mentioning that "if it is a planned act of the 1) money lender, 2)his daughter in law being the purchaser of the property in the auction sale and 3) the wife of ex-owner (who is expired in 2005) desiring to receive the remaining amount from the auction sale after payment to the money lender, then it is bit difficult and would take lot of time too to prove and might need multiple opposition petitions and fresh cases also might need to be applied"
All our family members have lost sleep over this matter and looking at the honest timeframe and the multiple cases mentioning by our lawyer - it looks scary too. Can our ICICI bank legal people help in this regard as the document is still with them under loan for which we pay the EMI.