I have read your mail and thank you very much for immediate response sir. Here one issue is there .(I) ??? Actually Mr. Y the Secretary of the same union told to Mr. X for issue of receipts and he advised to Mr. X all employees will pay the money very soon. Mr. X agreed. After that Mr. X forgot the issue. This secretary agreed before me also that he told to Mr. X to give receipts. He (II) ??? Mr. Y promised that he will collect money later. Same was done. Then all the employees taken receipts.(III) ??? Some employees paid money . Some are balance. Here 30 employees taken loan through the chief promotor/president of Mr. X. (IV) ??? Every person taken 25 to 30 thousand. some was cleared their loan. some was not cleared. Now co-operative bank persons approached the chief promotor of Mr. X and Secretary, treasurer. So how can i protect Mr. X , Y and Z from the bank sir.(V) ??? I have started my law practice recently on september ,2010. I have to utilise our forum and others advises. Please reply to me for this sir.
thanking you
Dear M. N. Raju,
First of all, what ever I replied, replying is without any prejudice and I does not take any kind of liability and / or responsibility for what ever I commented / answered or will do so in future. This is your indemnity to me.
Still it is difficult to understand what you want to say? To have proper constituted of your sentence/s, please use Microsoft Word, type your letter, save and copy paste. At some places you have broken sentence by wrongly using full point, this changes whole meaning. Any how, my answer rather comments on your own notes as in brackets followed by three question marks related to points changed in red types as above. To understand what I am trying to tell is, first read yours then my question as below:-
(I) Is there any proof with X that Y has promised him that borrower members will pay money later?, Y misguided X rather induced him to issue receipt without receiving money? You mentioned that Y has committed certain things in your presence, but since you are going to defend X, it does not sound good that you again stand as witness.
(II) Y collected money later, is there proof? Say for example without payment X issued receipt on 1st of a month, then as mutually arranged, Y later date 10th collected money and gave to X. Now on 10th this what ever amount was received must have been recorded in cash book / receipt side and particular borrower member’s loan a/c must have been credited. X can not keep such cash on hand as his own money. If these detail available with proof, X can take the point in his favor. You mentioned “some was done “what this mean? Is there scope that some of these members make an affidavit confirming such transaction; I mean such member will have to give in writing by an affidavit that even though he has not paid due installments for his loan, Y got him receipt and later date he paid Rs… to the secretary Y ???
(III) And (IV) In addition of the guarantor’s undertaking to pay if the principal borrower fail to repay loan, the coop bank must have checked about the principal applicant / borrower’s income, ability / capacity to replay etc. You need to check all these. The borrower must have signed documents which empowers the bank to take recovery actions initially/ first against him. Please excuse me for this comment; but, don’t act as child, and submit vague quires!
Every person took 25 – 30,000 ?? I can not believe that the bank, accepter for every case guarantee given by X. Even if X is so rich, still bank will ask rather insists for second guarantor that also preferably new person, any one other than X. Can you through enough lights on this issue and other question as above?
(V) Congratulations for starting your own practice. Wishing you all the best for your future endeavors to get settled in the profession and become a reputed person. But dear, frankly I feel that (a) either you are being taken for ride by X (b) you are not informed of hidden truths (c) being eager to get clients quickly, you are in hurry to take up and defend X, hence consider (a) and (b), be careful that the honorable court does not pass any strictures on you! Hoping that I am wrong in these (a), (b) and (c), in that case, in the interest your client X, keeping high sprit and dignity of the profession, please referred the case to senior advocate in you area. With my compliments, high respects and regards; wish to tell you that; seniors have four brains, four eyes and two nose, they can see hidden truths, they can think fast and much better than us, they can smell any fishy deal!