Complaint

Judges in India dont like party in person cases.  They expect parties to have advocates.  Advocates dont open mouth in front of judges fearing that tmrw they will hve to come and stand before that judge again asking some other favor.

But party in person wont have such inhibitions.  They argue well.  They dont care what the judge thinks or others think.  Judge will feel embarassed by your behavour.  Hence this is happening.

This is wrong.  You can complain.  But complaints like yours courts get in large numbers.

You write all of your complaints in a letter.  get an affidavit for that letter and send it to registrar vigilance of high court.  Send 1 complaint copy.  One self attested copy of the same along with original complaint. And the affidavit.  Remember entire ocntents of your affidavit should include entire contents of your complaint.  Regisrar will send it for approval to CJI.  If complaint is registered you will get a reply and complaint number from the Registrar Vigilance.

If you dont get any reply.  Consider your complaint to not have registered.  You can follow up with RTI application in case your complaint aginst judge is not registered.

Remember you will have to file affidavit.  Without affidavit complaint wont get registered.

You have yourdelf replied to your query. If anybody wants to make a complaint against the partial attitude of a Judge of a Court of Law, he needs to have unshakeable, tangible and verifiable evidence with him, this evidence has to be beyond all possible doubts to prove what you have stated in your query. This is next to impossible.

If, neverthless, you submit a complaint against a sitting Judge of a Court of Law and fail to substantiate it, you may face a charge of contempt of the Court, and this is a very serious charge punishable with imprisonment.

Originally posted by : Naa Channel Naa Istam
	Shetty sir humble pranams to your lotus feet for the suggestion. but how can I proove the facts happened in the court for which I don't have any evidence except my inner consciousness in the court hours as they can't be recorded.

The Registrar Viglance will have his own way of handling this.  It is open court, there are lot of people around, someone must have accomopanied you, he or she can become witness.  Any recording you have done can be submitted as verifiable evidence.  Plus the affidavit itself become a evidence/witness in absence of any other witness or evidence through which case of complaint may be decided.

Originally posted by : Kishor Mehta
	You have yourdelf replied to your query. If anybody wants to make a complaint against the partial attitude of a Judge of a Court of Law, he needs to have unshakeable, tangible and verifiable evidence with him, this evidence has to be beyond all possible doubts to prove what you have stated in your query. This is next to impossible. If, neverthless, you submit a complaint against a sitting Judge of a Court of Law and fail to substantiate it, you may face a charge of contempt of the Court, and this is a very serious charge punishable with imprisonment.

If complainant has recordings video and audio he can submit the same to the court.  Judges made use of this loophole that nobody will dare complain for longest time and still doing wrongs.

Not everyone will have secondary evidence.  Affidavit will become one evidence.  The registrar vigilance has spies who can confess to the acts of the judge.

Even if the complainant cannot prove, which in most cases is so, contempt proceedings too are rare, dont thieves knows about thieves? Kishore Mehta?