bharatbhai vyas 05 February 2023
At ACB trial court when complaintat testimony is over. And he declares all the statement as par PANCHNAMA before trial court , there is no other eye witness or any other material documents to support complaintat testimony present at court ., Is it enough to prove demand ?
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 06 February 2023
Whether ACB (prosecution) has closed its evidence ?
What is the demand involved / raised in an ACB case?
What is your concern / locus standi to the complaint case?
bharatbhai vyas 06 February 2023
1 . Yes , this matter is now end and trial court convicted the accused (govt.employee )under prevention of curruption act.
2. The demand for money was granting agriculture subsidy money.which was already done by high Authority as par rules & regulation.
My queary is that when complaintat subsidy was granted and subsidy amount transferred in complaintat bank account . Then after he lodje FIR saying that accused demanded bribe money
ACB arranged trap and at the place third party (public person) caught to receive money on behalf of accused. Where accused was not present.
If complaintat don't give bribe money what was the problem with him where his subsidy was granted and deposited? It means that complaintat intention was to trap accused any way in bribe case.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
