1. In 1980, the land has been seized under Urban Ceiling Act as surplus vacant land. The owner objected the ceiling, citing that it is an agricultural land with ongoing agricultural activity. The competent ceiling authority (Court) has rejected this appeal, terming that in Survey the land has been found as "residential" in Master Plan of the town and subsequently seized it under Ceiling.
2. In 2000, the land has been returned under Repeal Act.
3. Now the sons of the owner, after his intestate death, has mutated their names as per UPZALR Act treating it as agricultural land. They have Khasra and Khatoni for it.
Questions:
(a) How the land can be agricutural when it has been seized under Urban Ceiling Act and the apeeal for the agricultual hoarding was rejected by then?
(b) If the land was residential then how the mutation was done by 171 of UPZALR and how Khasra and Khatoni are there?
