The Indian Penal Code, was enacted by the British around 1860 or so. Most people in the legal fratenity know that Lord Macaulay was the architect of the IPC.
Under the IPC adultery is an offence. But it is an offence committed by the male involved only. One can say that Lord Macaulay was the Winsten Churchill of the 19th century. He was a well-known English writer extremely proud of his English heritage. He had a derisive opinion of Hindu customs and Hindu culture. Under the English law both the man and the woman are culpable. Some members of the IPC commission wanted that under the Indian law also it should be the same. Lord Macaulay went at length to explain that how the situation in India was different from that in England. He is said to have exclaimed that the Hindu woman was a pitiable creature with no control over herself and she should be spared culpability under the adultery law.
That was how Indian woman [read Hindu woman] escaped the clutches of adultery law. Anyway 150 years have passed since. A world of changes have taken place.
What are the opinions of learned club members? Should the law of adultery be amended?