It has been quite a year of sections for me starting from DV to 498a. I have question here on validation of documents submitted by the lawyers. My case started with police complaint where my wife alleged that she has been mentally harassed by me and now she is NOT mentally well. This complaint nowhere said that any physical harassment has happened OR talk about my parents. After a few days, I got an DV court case notice, where it has been stated that I'd beaten her badly and further my parents didn't come to rescue her at all. It has been stated that she needs 15 lacks and one bed room set to retain her peace of mind.
I’ve filed divorced petition and as usual she filed 498a case. I've asked in CAW cell to show any evidences where I've beaten her and showed them the police complaint, which says that it’s a "mental" harassment and not "physical" harassment. As usual, IO repeated that "mental" harassment comes only when there is "physical" harassment. I was wondering why in this world only our law and order gives so much flexibility to women!
This is the background of my case. What I want to ask here is that in DV case my wife first claimed that she is not working and she needs money to maintain her (my wife dropped her current employment and joined some other place). When we hired a private detective to furnish this fact, her mother came to know about this and suggested my wife to drop her present employment as well. My wife's lawyer asked her to join some other company. In next petition, my wife claimed that she is earning 22 thousand per month and filed another claim in domestic violence that she still needs maintenance. Two judges have been changed since the DV case is going-on. I tried to get the evidence to know where she has been working in these three months but failed to get that. My question here is that my wife made two different statements in the court so is there is a section under which I can sue her to say that she made two completely different statements.
This is not just with DV case but with the divorce case as well; they've filed two completely different answers. Her lawyer has put-up the completely different facts on divorce versus DV case.
Just seeking an expert advice to counter maintenance claim.
Mango