Impleadment of parties.

Rubi ,

your question is not clear. please do not hesitate to simplify the same.

In a Pendign Suit the purchaser of Plaintiff got decree againtthew said plaitnff and  he wanted to be impleaded as Plaintiff - for thsi he may be added as Plf Nop;-5 of Deft. in the suti to protect hsi interest .The Plf 1 to 4 need not be  removed . As on the dat eof the suti the said purchaser was nto owner - he was only agreement holder and gotr a decree after the suti .

he can be impleaded as party interested in the suti proerty - the origianl plaintff need not be removed .

The Purchaser ( Decree Holder ) may be impleaded as Plaintiff No;-5  /or/  as one of the  Defendants to protect his interest in the suti subject matter !  

As per Order 1 Rule 6- CPC the intnding party has to file a petition before the court stateing the intention / reson therein  with a pryer to made him as party in the suit. than the court will allow him to add him as party in the suit.  O1 R6 clearly speaks that " The plaintiff may, at his option, join as parties to the same suit all or any of the persons severally, or jointly and severally, laibale on any one contract, including parties to bills of exchange, hundis and peromssory notes."

Please Read  rule 10Order 22 of the CPC  where if the subject matter of the suit property was transfered then interest party with the permission of the court can step in

The new owner can  add himself (after making necessary appln.) as a party defendant. Thereafter, he can make an application in the court for transposing him as a plaintiff and the plaintiffs as defendants. Thereafter, and / or in the same application he can pray that the old plaintiffs (now after transposition defendants) should be deleted.

Are there any judgments to this that the Plaintiff has an option to join parties to the suit??