charges framed --- u/s 498/406/dp act.
issue ---forge bills submited by the lady .jweler is sayin to sales tax that he has not sold any iteam against those bills ,moreover these are just estimates .Jweler even called me and said the same thing .However police is saying purchase taken place against those bills/estimates .Police has presented those documents as bills.
I have moved an application u/s 156 ( 3)-----ATR recieved ,ATR says that matter is subjudice u/s 498 /406 and in the said case a jweler is a witness , so the applicant should get his grievances there only ,and it is well setteled law that when the matter is subjudice no action can be taken place .
i want to know that what should be our basis to differentiate two crimes .so that magisrate consider this 156 application. and dont dismiss it saying that get your grievance registered in 498/06 case.
