District Consumer Forum ruled and asked the Bank to adhere to Loan agreement and disagreed with enhanced EMI. Banker did not comply. Upon filing Execution Application, the Banker preferred an appeal with State Commission but never attended proceedings for more than two years. Their appeal was dismissed for default. Under EA proceedings Bailable Arrest Warrant is being issued (as told to me by the Hon'ble bench) against Banker, who has been adopting delay tactics as the burden of interest lies with the consumer.The Banker woke up now and petitioned the State Commission on flimsy grounds (accident/fracture) to set aside it earlier dismissal order (for default). I am not able to service the loan account any further as my next rupee payment shall go to undue dues still being maintained in the loan account, that the forum has not upheld.
Can the State Commission set aside its earlier dismissal order for default?
Under what sections of law can I block their nefarious design?
Any advice on my next steps is welcome.
Thanks in advance.