Sarita Kumari 16 June 2022
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 17 June 2022
Originality of the audio recording has been tampered therefore, it would not be admitted in evidence and certificate given under section 65 B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 will be challengable.
Sarita Kumari 17 June 2022
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 18 June 2022
@ Ms. Sarita Kumari,
You have stated, inter alia, that,
"The case is going on ex-parte."
In an ex-parte case what do you intend to prove in a case u/s 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which is generelly confidential between aggrieved person and respondent(s) and least required to be proved.
Further you have stated, that,
"As the applicant husband himself transferred the audio file to his G-drive so who else can issue a certificate on that?"
After transfer of audio from an instrument (phone) to G-drive of computers it is to be termed as "tempered and not original" which is not admissible even as secondary evidence.
Besides this, your query qua,
"Now what opssible options are available to submit the single audio file as an evidence.?"
Is it required to be submitted ? I didn't find any reason to submit tempered audio file.
It would be better to prove such communication by oral statement of witness(es), even if none was present as there is no one for rebuttal being stated to have been proceeded "ex-parte".