Adverse possession

The property purchased on the name of the minors should have been claimed by the minors within three years from the date of attaining majority by age or from the date of knowledge.

If they remained silent and the possession of their share of property by the other person was hostile and  adverse to them then the current possessor can claim title by perfecting the law of adverse possession. 

X is in possession of the land for 50 years far beyond the 12 years under the law of limitation. Hence no one else can stake a claim.

Adv. Kalaiselvan

"Adverse possession law originated from English common law and aims to ensure productive use of land while protecting the rights of possessors."

No please, The 12 years under the law of limitation is from the ancient Hindu Law.

Valmiki specifically says why Lord Rama was banished for 14 years. After 12 years Rama could not claim back the kingdom from Bharatha. Another 2 years were added to make matters doubly sure.

Pandavas were banished to the forest for 12 years. Another year of life incognito was added to make things doubly sure.

In the case of Rama, his brother held the kingdom in trust only and willingly gave it back to Lord Rama.

In the case of Pandavas the ownership was settled by war.

This was the law when the British came to India and they simply adopted the same.

Originally posted by : Dr. MPS RAMANI Ph.D.[Tech.]

Thank u both for ur replies...but wen I enquired with lawyers here they r saying since registered sale deed n pahani is in deir name court goes with the document as main proof. Since Dey r filing eviction suit if I defend with adverse possession wat r de supporting documents I hv to submit??? Bcs X purchased the land with cash 50 yrs ago. So we cannot show any proof fr it today... Also fr adverse I can only show tax,water n current bill from our end to show X is in possession.. Other than these how do i prove as burden lies on our head if we choose adverse route.

The other party has also to produce evidence of actulal physical occupation or of interest in the property for the past 50 years. A 50 year old document alone is not enough. You have constructed a house, you have water and electricity bills. If you search you may find other evidences including witnesses. Has the opposite party got paralell evidence? It is not easy for the other party also to show evidence of occupation or of interest in the property for the past 50 years. Why did they not issue eviction notice for the past 50 years?

How has been land which is registered in the name of the brother and sister utilised? This, to my knowledge, is the deciding the issue of aderse possession.

Originally posted by : P. Venu
	How has been land which is registered in the name of the brother and sister utilised? This, to my knowledge, is the deciding the issue of aderse possession.

I have constructed the house around 15 yrs ago where half portion has been in deir land. We have developed n maintained crops in de farm from which we have yearly yeilding,planted silver trees n fully grown silver trees are cut n given for timber ( this itself shows how much years it will take fr a silver trees to grow).

"I have constructed the house around 15 yrs ago where half portion has been in deir land."!
Admittedly, you are playing hide and seek with the facts.

Moreover, why you bent  upon imposing SMS language on us? What prevents you from posting the  post in simple language?

Any how, possession is a question of fact than of documents.

Originally posted by : P. Venu
	"I have constructed the house around 15 yrs ago where half portion has been in deir land."!Admittedly, you are playing hide and seek with the facts. Moreover, why you bent  upon imposing SMS language on us? What prevents you from posting the  post in simple language? Any how, possession is a question of fact than of documents.

Wats wrong with you??? 😡 😡  😡 😠 wat hide n seek r u talking about??

I dint use any complicated English vocabulary to sound this post as complicated. I have framed sentence in simple English only. Moreover u being lawyer u dono the spelling of adverse. and also the sentence mentioned by you in ur previous reply is grammatically wrong.( "This, to my knowledge, is the deciding the issue of aderse possession")

But so far I never commented on ur English writing skills/grammatical error/ spelling mistake.So first u correct ur mistakes before pointing fingers on me. 

How I need to write my query is left to my thought process.I have a query n I have posted here in my own writing style. If ur willing to answer to my query well n good,if not u can ignore n go...but u have no rights to question as to hw I have to frame a question or about my writing format. Bcs i am not writing any official mail here.