Hi Friends,
My estranged wife had put 498a/406 and implicated me and my parents way back in July 2010. I had tried out 239 in district court but couldn't discharge myself and my parents. I had then gone in for 397 in sessions court but again couldn't get discharge for all of us.
Now charges have been framed on me and parents in 498a/406 by the court. I have now gone in for revision against the framing of charges in sessions court. I have made seperate files - 3 files 1 for myself 1 for my father and 1 for my mother and filed in sessions court. I am arguing myself i.e. party in person for all 3 of us. I would be asking the Hon'ble court to give me 3 separate dates for arguing separately for each of us.
I had gone to my estranged wife hometown on 3 occasions before she filed the 498a case so she kind of made the jurisdiction in her hometown with all false and baseless allegations on those dates and filed the cases in her hometown. But my parents had never visited her hometown after the marriage and there is no mention of it in her complaint or chargesheet.
Query
=====
1. I have a very interesting query. Can I put one point in my revision petition of my parents that there is no jurisdiction of the courts to entertain 498a/406 for my parents at least. Because each accused case has to looked at in a different perspective as I believe. Please do keep in mind that we don't have IPC 34 on us (Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) so I believe 498a/406 for my parents should be seen separately than me.
This is just a thought. I might be wrong.
Please do clarify and help me understand w.r.t law so that I can jot it down in my revision application.
2. The allegations of harassment w.r.t my father are not specific although there are specific allegations w.r.t my mother in the complaint copy/F.I.R. So one of my other points in revision application for my father would be - "there are no specific allegations against the accused". What more detail could I write. OR is only one statement is enough ? Also please do help with some judgements around it.
3. Cruelty as per the definition of 498a (a) and (b) is not alleged in the complaint or FIR. There is no cruelty alleged by the complainant as per the definition of 498a (a) & (b) so my father should be discharged. Please do help in judgements around these.
Since I am presenting the files and would be arguing separately so is it possible that my father is discharged from say 498a/406 and my mother is discharged from say only 406. I am not fighting for the discharge of my mother from 498a because prima facie there are allegations in the complaint / FIR about beating by her.
Please help on w.r.t law and guide me as to what the law says.
Thanks and Regards,
Sid.