LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

disciplinary action for tempering document

From the attached file I find the dismissal order was for:-

1. Leaving headquarters without permission.

2. Not reporting for duty despite calling upon you to report for duty.

3. tampering with a sick certificate.

Tampering is only incidental. The main reason is not reporting for duty despite calling upon you to do so.  In other words disobedience.

Was the doctor examined in the inquiry to prove tampering? What prevented you from examining the concerned doctor to prove that there was no tampering? Probably, doctor must have been reluctant to appear as a witness in the inquiry at your instance.



Learning

 5 Replies


(Guest)

From the attached file I find the dismissal order was for:-

1. Leaving headquarters without permission.

2. Not reporting for duty despite calling upon you to report for duty.

3. tampering with a sick certificate.

Tampering is only incidental. The main reason is not reporting for duty despite calling upon you to do so.  In other words disobedience.

Was the doctor examined in the inquiry to prove tampering? What prevented you from examining the concerned doctor to prove that there was no tampering? Probably, doctor must have been reluctant to appear as a witness in the inquiry at your instance.


(Guest)

Soni ji,

First file a suit in the court. Later everyt thing come into the light. Your departmental officer have to give all answers with evidence. Go ahead need not worry.

vivek dhavalikar (advocate high court.)     27 November 2009

proceedings of inquiry are abuse of process of violative of art 309and 311 of const of india and in the court of law deserves to be quashed.

1 Like

(Guest)

In the light of the facts narrated by you, you will succeed in industrial dispute.

vivek dhavalikar (advocate high court.)     01 December 2009

1.punishment is excessive than gravity of offence.2. right to defend if was denied then enquiry proceedings may be said to be void. thus may be remanded for cross examination of the witnesses where the employee was denied. 3.but court will see whether inquiry proceedings are delayed intentionally by the aggrieved person or not. 4.all the charges as shown in the charge sheet may amount for misconduct punshment should have to be given not as dissmisal but in the form of censure or minor one.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register