Ms. Sailaja,
The question of whether S. 498-A filing is proper or not or whether conviction can be achieved is purely based on the facts of the case. If during the matrimonial life, if you met with physical harassment, cruelty or mental harassment by your husband or any of his relatives on account of dowry demand or otherwise, then Section 498-A lies. Otherwise not. It has no relation that you filed it two years after his filing of divorce petition. It is unheard of that filing the divorce petition gives immunity to the husband to face criminal trial for the physical harassment or mental cruelty perpetrated against his wife during their cohabitation. Let us suppose, that the husband committed the offences as described in Sectin 498-A to derive dowry from the wife and from his hapless parents. After succeding to some extent of swindling the dowry, and reaches an informative conclusion that nothing further could be extricated, he would file divorce petition to get rid of his subdued wife with further intention of finding a new victim for his predation. So, if you met with such cruelty, then go for Section 498-A. Quite often people miss a very important factor, that Section 498-A is not an offence by the husband against the wife, but it is an offence against the State. The object of Sectin 498-A is not harmonise the relationship between the cruel husband and victimised wife and restore the matrimonial life, but to stop the trend of male atrocities against females, as latter being weak and forced to live in husband's home by force of cultural ethos in altogether alien atmosphere. This protective beneficial provision could not be used by the women because of the stigma they may face if the criminal case is filed against the husband or lurking suspicion that her matrimonial life may be irreparably damaged. With these phobias arises out of our despicable male dominated cultural society, the victimised women are not in a position to avail the benefits of Section 498-A.