@meenakshi,
There is a genuine problem for executing the orders by the women who get favourable order for maintenance for themselves or for the children either in Section 125 cr.P.C or DV case. The husband pays for one or two months and later on stop to pay it. The wfie files execution petition and again after paying once or twice he becomes defaulter by putting lame excuse. For every execution petition she has to incur substantial amount for legal expenses. the courts will not invent to find out an easy solution to implement their own orders which affect the very survival of the parties before them. The judicial delays coupled with litigation expenses and spending significant part of the life in court corridors discourage the women, whose legal rights are infringed by their husbands to approach the legal system. A few women who approach the courts get huge abuses from the male dominated society.
I disagree to my learnd friend Chandu when he says paying once or twice and than he becomes defaulter . Why isnt it contempt of court and action can be taken ,property can be attached ,the court can direct the company where he works to deduct from his salary and pay it directly to his wife .
Even most of the Section 498-A cases, DV cases and also Dowry demand cases are genuine contrary to the popular rhetoric created by the male chauvanists in the web-media. Most of the Section 498-A cases cannot be proved for the reason that cruelties are perpetrated within the four walls of the matrimonial home.
I disagree with this point that it cannot be proved .If a case is genuine why cant it be proved . Doing law and unable to prove a case whats the worth of a degree .?? Not having faith in one's self ??
We quite often see how women are ridiculed in the films, literature and in the society. It is a clear indication how a woman is treated within the four walls. Female foeticide is one more significant clear indication that how we treat the women in our society.
When Dv is filed i would say child abuse/child custody is one of the most abused cases for a father
Mr Chandu Go through the below report first before contradicting reality and facts
Law panel wants anti-dowry law toned down
The government’s expert panel on legal issues has recommended a change in the criminal law to prevent the immediate arrest of husbands and their family members against whom police complaints are filed by their wives under the anti-dowry law.
The Law Commission of India, in its latest report, has asked the government to water the anti-dowry law down to allow a woman to withdraw her complaint if a compromise with her husband and his family is possible. The law panel also wants to make it a compoundable offence but with a court’s permission.
The Supreme court had asked the law commission to give its findings on whether section 498A of the IPC and enabling laws, which deal with physical and mental cruelty by husbands and their relatives against wives over dowry, require amendments following several reports of their misuse.
It has sought an amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in an attempt to introduce a 30-day “reconciliation” period before the police can arrest an accused under the anti-dowry law.
“The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest in the context of cases under section 498A the IPC has been emphasised by courts and parliamentary committees time and again,” the report states.
under cruelty to husband you can see
762,425 cases registers
643,820 are pending
100,453 completed
Convicted to Trials completed was 21%
Convited to Total Trials 2.7%
The Metro women enjoys all the liberties while the rural women who suffer more hardly have a recourse to law .
|