Dv main appln rejcetd but interim contd how is it possible ?

There seems to be some confusion in the mind of the magistrate which passing such order. Interim maintenance is up to the date the main petition is decided. Once the main petition comes to end and is dismissed the interim maintenance too comes to an end. The magistrate should have ordered for maintenance to aggrieved party namely wife till the finalisation of trial in S 498 A IPC complaint rather mentioning it as interim maintenance. The mistake need to be corrected that when appeal against the order of the trial court is moved will be done by the appellant court. Now the question here is who will move appeal against the order?

Dont pose academic query here.

Judges are not fools to pass orders like described above.

You have already gone to sessions court based on your previous posts 1 year back. And have aslo posted regarding SC involvement in IA of DV case.

Dont use your brain unecessasrily.

Sir, kindly look into my previous threads.
SC had issued directions to trial court to dispose the matter. Plus this is not acamedic question neither the hypothetical question. In reallife the Hon'ble court given such final order.

Thank you very for your prompt response sir.. Yes I'm in great confusion on what to do.

I believe there is either some misunderstanding on your part or mistake on part of the Judge.  Interim orders cease to exist once the final order is pronounced.  Moreover the choice of wordings as far as whether Domestic Violence has been comitted or not leaves room for much ambiguity.  Therefore it is advisable for you to challenge the same. 

Originally posted by : Zuniee
	Sir, kindly look into my previous threads. SC had issued directions to trial court to dispose the matter. Plus this is not acamedic question neither the hypothetical question. In reallife the Hon'ble court given such final order.

You can copy of judgement?  Without seeing that, it is foolish to continue discussion on this topic.

Just file application under 127 CrPc for cancellation of maintenance on the grounds of change of circumstances.

Recently I was under custody just because of that continued Interim order. Appelling against the same in Sessions Court now. My advocate is confident that he will get stay on Crl.Misc proceedings (The one which trail court had registered by itself to track the interim maintenance) and also told me he will challange the order of continued interim maintenence... Please wish us the best of luck.